106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19911104)
1. Intermediate-term results with a modified antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery.
Crockarell JR
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Sep; 38(9):E144-8. PubMed ID: 19911104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.
Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Acetabulum reinforcement ring with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision].
Liu W; Yang J; Pei F; Shen B; Zhou Z; Kang P
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):902-4. PubMed ID: 23012918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Bortolami O; Bartolozzi P
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1057-63.e1. PubMed ID: 22397857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.
Kösters C; Schliemann B; Decking D; Simon U; Zurstegge M; Decking J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 26280965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Acetabular reconstruction using bone allograft in the revision of total hip prosthesis].
Morand F; Clarac JP; Gayet LE; Pries P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Apr; 84(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 9775059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
Zhang H; Pei FX; Yang J; Shen B; Shi R
Chin J Traumatol; 2005 Oct; 8(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 16176755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival Analysis of Allografting and Antiprotrusio Cage in Treating Massive Acetabular Bone Defects.
Chang CY; Wu CT; Numan H; Kuo FC; Wang JW; Lee MS
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):682-687. PubMed ID: 32943318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of uncemented Beznoska acetabular cup - mid-term results at the orthopedic ward in Pelhrimov].
Letocha J; Behounek J; Skoták M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17623608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Poor results of the cementless total hip arthroplasty with a nonporous coated acetabular component: AcSys Shearer Cup.
Ikema M; Oyama M; Kita A; Funayama K
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Sep; 12(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 17909932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components.
Lingaraj K; Teo YH; Bergman N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Dec; 91(12):1555-60. PubMed ID: 19949116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions.
Comba F; Buttaro M; Pusso R; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jul; 88(7):865-9. PubMed ID: 16798986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.
Unger AS; Lewis RJ; Gruen T
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1002-9. PubMed ID: 16376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hip joint arthroplasty following surgical treatment of acetabular fracture].
Pavelka T; Linhart M; Houcek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 17026886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?
Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
