These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19911137)

  • 1. The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: evidence from the arrow flanker task.
    Chen J; Li C; He C; Chen A
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 52(10):990-4. PubMed ID: 19911137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: electrophysiological evidence.
    van Steenbergen H; Band GP; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jul; 90(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 22504294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of cognitive control: a validation study of conflict adaptation.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2012 May; 49(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 22292850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring conflict- and target-related movement of visual attention.
    Wendt M; Garling M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1053-73. PubMed ID: 24131353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Sprengel M; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 30083838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of repetition priming on electrophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1621-30. PubMed ID: 21806636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict and error adaptation in the Simon task.
    Notebaert W; Verguts T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 21420518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control adjustments and conflict adaptation in major depressive disorder.
    Clawson A; Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Aug; 50(8):711-21. PubMed ID: 23735120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional adjustment to conflict strength: evidence from the effects of manipulating flanker-target SOA on response times and prestimulus pupil size.
    Wendt M; Kiesel A; Geringswald F; Purmann S; Fischer R
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 24149239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms underlying flexible adaptation of cognitive control: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence in a flanker task.
    Zurawska Vel Grajewska B; Sim EJ; Hoenig K; Herrnberger B; Kiefer M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1421():52-65. PubMed ID: 21981803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-flanker discriminability affects conflict size but not sustained suppression.
    Zeischka P; Coomans D; Deroost N; Vandenbossche J; Soetens E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 21185548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Boehler CN; Notebaert W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110462. PubMed ID: 25340396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.
    Scherbaum S; Fischer R; Dshemuchadse M; Goschke T
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 21044093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences.
    D'Angelo MC; Jiménez L; Milliken B; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 22612164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.