These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19911173)

  • 1. Immunoassay detection in a perfluorocarbon emulsion oxygen therapeutic.
    Barlag RE; Halsall HB; Heineman WR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Jan; 396(2):675-80. PubMed ID: 19911173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amperometric homogeneous competitive immunoassay in a perfluorocarbon emulsion oxygen therapeutic (PEOT).
    Barlag RE; Halsall HB; Heineman WR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2013 Apr; 405(11):3541-7. PubMed ID: 23104312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved sensitivity for methotrexate analysis using enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique on the Siemens Viva-E instrument.
    Borgman MP; Hiemer MF; Molinelli AR; Ritchie JC; Jortani SA
    Ther Drug Monit; 2012 Apr; 34(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 22377747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An influenza hemagglutinin A peptide assay based on the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique.
    Chiu ML; Lai D; Monbouquette HG
    J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2011; 32(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21253966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Dade Behring Syva EMIT 2000 tacrolimus assay on the Bayer Advia 1650.
    Stephen DW; Rooke P; Clark S; Coutts M; Crowe L; Docherty D
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Nov; 40(Pt 6):697-700. PubMed ID: 14629812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Homogeneous amperometric immunoassay for theophylline in whole blood.
    Athey D; McNeil CJ; Bailey WR; Hager HJ; Mullen WH; Russell LJ
    Biosens Bioelectron; 1993; 8(9-10):415-9. PubMed ID: 8311938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in whole blood. Comparison of liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry with the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique.
    Ansermot N; Fathi M; Veuthey JL; Desmeules J; Rudaz S; Hochstrasser D
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Jul; 41(10-11):910-3. PubMed ID: 18358833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of serum theophylline concentrations measured by high pressure liquid chromatography and quantitative enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique.
    Sheen AE; Sly RM; Hite S; Giblin VR; Hebert M
    Ann Allergy; 1979 Feb; 42(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underestimation of rat serum vancomycin concentrations measured by an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique and the strategy for its avoidance.
    Konishi H; Iga I; Nagai K
    Drug Test Anal; 2014 Apr; 6(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 23943307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of automated ACMIA and EMIT immunoassays for whole blood cyclosporin monitoring.
    Dessars B; Cotton F; Thiry P; Gulbis B
    Clin Lab; 2003; 49(3-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 12705695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of the MTP immunoassay with EMIT in blood screening for drugs].
    Käferstein H; Sticht G
    Arch Kriminol; 1998; 202(5-6):165-72. PubMed ID: 10023491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plasmatic levels of theophylline in asthmatic patients. Comparative evaluations of two different methods.
    Juárez-Olguín H; Flores-Pérez J; Lares-Asseff I
    Arch Med Res; 1998; 29(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 9556922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of homogeneous enzyme immunoassay and high-pressure liquid chromatography for the determination of theophylline concentration in serum.
    Koup JR; Brodsky B
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1978 Jun; 117(6):1135-8. PubMed ID: 352208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of mycophenolic acid monitoring by an enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique.
    Martiny D; Macours P; Cotton F; Thiry P; Gulbis B
    Clin Lab; 2010; 56(7-8):345-53. PubMed ID: 20857899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical trial for therapeutic drug monitoring using microchip-based fluorescence polarization immunoassay.
    Tachi T; Hase T; Okamoto Y; Kaji N; Arima T; Matsumoto H; Kondo M; Tokeshi M; Hasegawa Y; Baba Y
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2011 Oct; 401(7):2301-5. PubMed ID: 21837465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Seralyzer and EMIT systems for determination of theophylline concentrations.
    Massoud N; Munzenberger P; Sarniak A
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1722-6. PubMed ID: 3529948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of two methods for therapeutic drug monitoring: FPIA (TDx) and Emit].
    Bogovskiĭ BP; Barmanova EIu
    Vopr Med Khim; 1991; 37(3):80-2. PubMed ID: 1949699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation of the EMIT theophylline assay to kinetic analyzers: the relationship of reaction kinetics to calculation procedures.
    Dietzler DN; Weidner N; Tieber VL; McDonald JM; Smith CH; Ladenson JH; Leckie MP
    Clin Chim Acta; 1980 Feb; 101(2-3):163-81. PubMed ID: 6987012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of HPLC & EMIT methods of cyclosporine assay in blood after bone marrow transplantation.
    Poonkuzhali B; Victoria J; Selvakumar R; Dennison D; Srivastava A; Jeyaseelan L; Chandy M; Kanagasabapathy AS
    Indian J Med Res; 1995 Jul; 102():39-41. PubMed ID: 7558209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.