330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19911626)
1. Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others.
Main JC; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
Perception; 2009; 38(9):1275-83. PubMed ID: 19911626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Facial-Action Imposter: How Head Tilt Influences Perceptions of Dominance From a Neutral Face.
Witkower Z; Tracy JL
Psychol Sci; 2019 Jun; 30(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 31009583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is it about me? Time-course of self-relevance and valence effects on the perception of neutral faces with direct and averted gaze.
McCrackin SD; Itier RJ
Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():47-64. PubMed ID: 29524467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex differences for the recognition of direct versus averted gaze faces.
Goodman LR; Phelan HL; Johnson SA
Memory; 2012; 20(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 22292806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces.
Burke D; Sulikowski D
Evol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 8(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 22947821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gaze direction affects the magnitude of face identity aftereffects.
Kloth N; Jeffery L; Rhodes G
J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces.
Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI
Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance.
Marshall P; Bartolacci A; Burke D
Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(1):1474704920910403. PubMed ID: 32124644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment.
Re DE; Lefevre CE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 25299763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different time course of visuocortical signal changes to fear-conditioned faces with direct or averted gaze: a ssVEP study with single-trial analysis.
Wieser MJ; Miskovic V; Rausch S; Keil A
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():101-10. PubMed ID: 25050854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences.
Main JC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Jones BC
Perception; 2010; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20301847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Catching eyes: effects of social and nonsocial cues on attention capture.
Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 25(3):720-7. PubMed ID: 24398595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gaze Direction Modulates the Relation between Neural Responses to Faces and Visual Awareness.
Madipakkam AR; Rothkirch M; Guggenmos M; Heinz A; Sterzer P
J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(39):13287-99. PubMed ID: 26424878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Peltola MJ; Linna-Aho K; Ruuhiala HJ
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2423-30. PubMed ID: 18402988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intranasal oxytocin enhances the perception of ambiguous averted gaze in women but not in men.
Zheng Y; Shi Y; Jia H; Gao S; Hu Z
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jul; 238(7):2021-2029. PubMed ID: 33754180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.
Mogilski JK; Welling LL
Hum Nat; 2017 Mar; 28(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 27752965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?
McIntosh TL; Lee AJ; Sidari MJ; Stower RE; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178206. PubMed ID: 28594843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers.
Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Main JC; Little AC; Welling LL; Feinberg DR; Tiddeman BP
Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):617-24. PubMed ID: 19864283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Adult Sex Ratio Predict Regional Variation in Facial Dominance Perceptions? Evidence From an Analysis of U.S. States.
Torrance JS; Kandrik M; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918776748. PubMed ID: 29860865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]