BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19911626)

  • 1. Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others.
    Main JC; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Perception; 2009; 38(9):1275-83. PubMed ID: 19911626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Facial-Action Imposter: How Head Tilt Influences Perceptions of Dominance From a Neutral Face.
    Witkower Z; Tracy JL
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jun; 30(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 31009583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is it about me? Time-course of self-relevance and valence effects on the perception of neutral faces with direct and averted gaze.
    McCrackin SD; Itier RJ
    Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():47-64. PubMed ID: 29524467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex differences for the recognition of direct versus averted gaze faces.
    Goodman LR; Phelan HL; Johnson SA
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 22292806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces.
    Burke D; Sulikowski D
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 8(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 22947821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gaze direction affects the magnitude of face identity aftereffects.
    Kloth N; Jeffery L; Rhodes G
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces.
    Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance.
    Marshall P; Bartolacci A; Burke D
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(1):1474704920910403. PubMed ID: 32124644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment.
    Re DE; Lefevre CE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 25299763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different time course of visuocortical signal changes to fear-conditioned faces with direct or averted gaze: a ssVEP study with single-trial analysis.
    Wieser MJ; Miskovic V; Rausch S; Keil A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():101-10. PubMed ID: 25050854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences.
    Main JC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Jones BC
    Perception; 2010; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20301847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Catching eyes: effects of social and nonsocial cues on attention capture.
    Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 25(3):720-7. PubMed ID: 24398595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaze Direction Modulates the Relation between Neural Responses to Faces and Visual Awareness.
    Madipakkam AR; Rothkirch M; Guggenmos M; Heinz A; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(39):13287-99. PubMed ID: 26424878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Peltola MJ; Linna-Aho K; Ruuhiala HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2423-30. PubMed ID: 18402988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intranasal oxytocin enhances the perception of ambiguous averted gaze in women but not in men.
    Zheng Y; Shi Y; Jia H; Gao S; Hu Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jul; 238(7):2021-2029. PubMed ID: 33754180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.
    Mogilski JK; Welling LL
    Hum Nat; 2017 Mar; 28(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 27752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?
    McIntosh TL; Lee AJ; Sidari MJ; Stower RE; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178206. PubMed ID: 28594843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers.
    Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Main JC; Little AC; Welling LL; Feinberg DR; Tiddeman BP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):617-24. PubMed ID: 19864283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Adult Sex Ratio Predict Regional Variation in Facial Dominance Perceptions? Evidence From an Analysis of U.S. States.
    Torrance JS; Kandrik M; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918776748. PubMed ID: 29860865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.