These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

698 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19912375)

  • 21. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
    Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
    J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
    Paqué F; Balmer M; Attin T; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 20307747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
    Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography.
    Gambill JM; Alder M; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1996 Jul; 22(7):369-75. PubMed ID: 8935064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
    Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file.
    Paqué F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 21419301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
    Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of influence of flexion angles of files in apical stop preparation by using manual and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Pereira AG; Fagundes dos Santos RM; Mendes Azevedo KC; Raposo LH; Biffi JC
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1383-6. PubMed ID: 22980183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study of the effects of two nickel-titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography.
    Loizides AL; Kakavetsos VD; Tzanetakis GN; Kontakiotis EG; Eliades G
    J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18037058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiological evaluation of the morphological changes of root canals shaped with ProTaper for hand use and the ProTaper and RaCe rotary instruments.
    Aguiar CM; Câmara AC
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 19032646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
    Nordmeyer S; Schnell V; Hülsmann M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21167758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel–titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT).
    Stern S; Patel S; Foschi F; Sherriff M; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):514-23. PubMed ID: 22625863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.