These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19912482)

  • 21. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study.
    Setz I; Lee SH; Engel E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9760365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The
    Kurtulus IL; Gurbulak AG
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):639-644. PubMed ID: 29735866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of matrix attachment installation load on movement and resultant forces in implant overdentures.
    Goto T; Nagao K; Ishida Y; Tomotake Y; Ichikawa T
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 24975368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methodology for measuring the in vitro seating and unseating forces of prefabricated attachment systems used to retain implant overdentures.
    Fakhry A; Tan SC; Heiner AD; Dehkordi-Vakil FH; Dircks HW
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19895429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17207077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The retentive forces of the locator attachment system at different angulations.
    Stergiou A; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 20(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 23495558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations.
    Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue.
    Ichikawa T; Horiuchi M; Wigianto R; Matsumoto N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8957878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wear simulation effects on overdenture stud attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 22123008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of retentive force reduction and wear of the locator attachment system with different implant angulations.
    Rabbani S; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 25671627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.