These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19912597)
1. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening. de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment? Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis. Hummel JM; Steuten LG; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CJ; Mulder N; Ijzerman MJ Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 23979875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization. Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: results from a discrete choice experiment. Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Severens JL; Dirksen CD Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 25128051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Hol L; de Bekker-Grob EW; van Dam L; Donkers B; Kuipers EJ; Habbema JD; Steyerberg EW; van Leerdam ME; Essink-Bot ML Br J Cancer; 2010 Mar; 102(6):972-80. PubMed ID: 20197766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Howard K; Salkeld G Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy? van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening in rural southern Taiwan. Lin YH; Kao CC Cancer Nurs; 2013; 36(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 22964866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments. Wortley S; Wong G; Kieu A; Howard K Patient; 2014; 7(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 24652475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey. Marshall DA; Johnson FR; Phillips KA; Marshall JK; Thabane L; Kulin NA Value Health; 2007; 10(5):415-30. PubMed ID: 17888107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies. Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran. Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. General populations' preferences for colorectal cancer screening: rationale and protocol for the discrete choice experiment in the SIGMO study. Brinkmann M; Diedrich L; Krauth C; Robra BP; Stahmeyer JT; Dreier M BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e042399. PubMed ID: 33478964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment. Brinkmann M; Diedrich L; Hemmerling M; Krauth C; Robra BP; Stahmeyer JT; Dreier M Value Health; 2023 Jan; 26(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 36031478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans. Partin MR; Grill J; Noorbaloochi S; Powell AA; Burgess DJ; Vernon SW; Halek K; Griffin JM; van Ryn M; Fisher DA Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 18381474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advancing Colorectal Cancer Detection With Blood-Based Tests: Qualitative Study and Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Population Preferences. Ong C; Cook AR; Tan KK; Wang Y JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Jul; 10():e53200. PubMed ID: 39018093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys. Wong MC; John GK; Hirai HW; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ching JY; Ng SS; Chan FK; Griffiths SM; Sung JJ Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 22836914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. DeBourcy AC; Lichtenberger S; Felton S; Butterfield KT; Ahnen DJ; Denberg TD J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Feb; 23(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 18157581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]