159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1991281)
1. Carcinoma of the female reproductive organs. Value of cross-sectional imaging.
Hricak H
Cancer; 1991 Feb; 67(4 Suppl):1209-18. PubMed ID: 1991281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Gynecological tumors of the true pelvis: Radiological diagnosis for pelvic tumors made simple].
Meissnitzer M; Meissnitzer T; Forstner R
Radiologe; 2015 Dec; 55(12):1117-30; quiz 1131. PubMed ID: 26610683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
Suzuki M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer. Radiologic staging.
Thoeni RF
Radiol Clin North Am; 1997 Mar; 35(2):457-85. PubMed ID: 9087214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Malignant neoplasms of the female pelvis].
Lehmann KJ
Radiologe; 2009 Aug; 49(8):753-64; quiz 765-6. PubMed ID: 19198793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current CT/MRI examination of the lower intestinal tract.
Thoeni RF; Rogalla P
Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol; 1994 Dec; 8(4):765-96. PubMed ID: 7742575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging and its value in the staging of cervical carcinoma - Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and pathological images with FIGO staging system.
Kirova G; Nedialkov K; Sergieva S
J BUON; 2004; 9(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 17415805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging in cervical cancer.
Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of MRI, CT and findings in staging of gynecologic malignancies].
Lorenzen M; Braun J; Gehrckens A; Nicolas V
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):266-72. PubMed ID: 9894525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of imaging in the pretreatment evaluation of common gynecological cancers.
Miccò M; Sala E; Lakhman Y; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):299-321. PubMed ID: 24956296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging in gynecologic malignancies.
Bragg DG; Hricak H
Cancer; 1993 Feb; 71(4 Suppl):1648-51. PubMed ID: 8431900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer of the uterus: the value of MRI pre- and post-irradiation.
Hricak H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1991 Sep; 21(4):1089-94. PubMed ID: 1917607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. State-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging in bladder cancer.
Setty BN; Holalkere NS; Sahani DV; Uppot RN; Harisinghani M; Blake MA
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 17331839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grueneisen J; Nagarajah J; Buchbender C; Hoffmann O; Schaarschmidt BM; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Quick HH; Umutlu L; Kinner S
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 26115367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].
Collettini F; Hamm B
Radiologe; 2011 Jul; 51(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 21688026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of a prospective study with comparison of clinical, endosonographic, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging of advanced gynecologic carcinoma and recurrence.
Houvenaeghel G; Delpero JR; Rosello R; Resbeut M; Viens P; Jacquemier J; Noirclerc M; Guerinel G
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8356495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Whole-body staging of malignant melanoma: advantages, limitations and current importance of PET-CT, whole-body MRI and PET-MRI].
Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
Radiologe; 2015 Feb; 55(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 25589421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
