159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1991281)
21. [CT and MR imaging in the evaluation and staging of lung cancer].
Kuriyama K; Kadota T; Kuroda C
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1990 Nov; 17(11):2140-7. PubMed ID: 2173493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The value of MRI in staging gynecologic tumors].
Lorenzen M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Mar; 6(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8679726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Role and responsibility of multimodal imaging in head and neck cancer].
Gõdény M
Magy Onkol; 2013 Sep; 57(3):182-202. PubMed ID: 24107825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: a comparison to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging alone.
Grueneisen J; Beiderwellen K; Heusch P; Gratz M; Schulze-Hagen A; Heubner M; Kinner S; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
Invest Radiol; 2014 Dec; 49(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 25010207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF TUMOR STAGING USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FINDINGS IN DOGS WITH NASAL NEOPLASIA: A PILOT STUDY.
Lux CN; Culp WTN; Johnson LR; Kent M; Mayhew P; Daniaux LA; Carr A; Puchalski S
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2017 May; 58(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 28233364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The integration of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in treatment planning for gynecologic cancer.
Russell AH; Anderson M; Walter J; Kinney W; Smith L; Scudder S
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 35(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 1544250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Issues in imaging malignant neoplasms of the female reproductive system.
Holalkere NS; Katur AM; Lee SI
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2009; 38(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19041037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The diagnosis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of ovarian carcinoma].
Mizuno K
Rinsho Byori; 1992 Feb; 40(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 1583787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Morphologic and functional imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Yamamuro M; Gerbaudo VH; Gill RR; Jacobson FL; Sugarbaker DJ; Hatabu H
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 17954021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Takahashi S; Ebina Y; Miyahara Y; Yamada H; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1672-6. PubMed ID: 23727380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Cross-sectional imaging of endometrial carcinoma: MR imaging and CT].
Hamm B; Pöllinger A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Jan; 124(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11873311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Management of thyroid cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.
Mitchell AL; Gandhi A; Scott-Coombes D; Perros P
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 May; 130(S2):S150-S160. PubMed ID: 27841128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Computerized tomography of pancreatic tumors].
Fargnoli R; Fusi I
Tumori; 1999; 85(1 Suppl 1):S3-5. PubMed ID: 10235071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.
Dinter DJ; Hofheinz RD; Hartel M; Kaehler GF; Neff W; Diehl SJ
Onkologie; 2008 May; 31(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 18497511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic value of whole body diffusion-weighted MRI compared to computed tomography for pre-operative assessment of patients suspected for ovarian cancer.
Michielsen K; Dresen R; Vanslembrouck R; De Keyzer F; Amant F; Mussen E; Leunen K; Berteloot P; Moerman P; Vergote I; Vandecaveye V
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Sep; 83():88-98. PubMed ID: 28734146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Imaging of the head and neck region].
Lell M; Mantsopoulos K; Uder M; Wuest W
HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):189-209; quiz 210. PubMed ID: 26923486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
