These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19913920)

  • 21. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reasoning, delusion proneness and stress: an experimental investigation.
    Keefe KM; Warman DM
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 20146200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Need for closure, jumping to conclusions, and decisiveness in delusion-prone individuals.
    McKay R; Langdon R; Coltheart M
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Jun; 194(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 16772859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stroop performance in pathological gamblers.
    Kertzman S; Lowengrub K; Aizer A; Nahum ZB; Kotler M; Dannon PN
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 May; 142(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16626810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychometric properties of Peters et al. delusions inventory-21 in adolescence.
    Kim Y; Chang JS; Hwang S; Yi JS; Cho IH; Jung HY
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 May; 207(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 23122557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The hemodynamics of cognitive control: the level of concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin in the superior prefrontal cortex varies as a function of performance in a modified Stroop task.
    León-Carrion J; Damas-López J; Martín-Rodríguez JF; Domínguez-Roldán JM; Murillo-Cabezas F; Barroso Y Martin JM; Domínguez-Morales MR
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18606191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Jumping to conclusions style along the continuum of delusions: delusion-prone individuals are not hastier in decision making than healthy individuals.
    So SH; Kwok NT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121347. PubMed ID: 25793772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Delusion-prone individuals: stuck in their ways?
    Laws KR; Kondel TK; Clarke R; Nillo AM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Apr; 186(2-3):219-24. PubMed ID: 21035195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stroop performance in normal control subjects: an fMRI study.
    Gruber SA; Rogowska J; Holcomb P; Soraci S; Yurgelun-Todd D
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jun; 16(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 12030821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of methylphenidate on Stroop Color-Word task performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Langleben DD; Monterosso J; Elman I; Ash B; Krikorian G; Austin G
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Mar; 141(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 16516306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Latent class analysis of delusion-proneness: exploring the latent structure of the Peters et al. delusions inventory.
    Rocchi MB; Sisti D; Manca S; Siddi S; Mura T; Preti A
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2008 Aug; 196(8):620-9. PubMed ID: 18974674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Jumping to conclusions in the less-delusion-prone? Preliminary evidence from a more reliable beads task.
    McLean BF; Mattiske JK; Balzan RP
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2020 Sep; 68():101562. PubMed ID: 32105906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective attention to threat bias in delusion-prone individuals.
    Lim M; Gleeson JF; Jackson HJ
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2011 Oct; 199(10):765-72. PubMed ID: 21964270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults.
    West R; Alain C
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Mar; 37(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 10731768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cardiovascular response to Stroop: effect of verbal response and task difficulty.
    Boutcher YN; Boutcher SH
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 16730405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical inefficiency in patients with unipolar depression: an event-related FMRI study with the Stroop task.
    Wagner G; Sinsel E; Sobanski T; Köhler S; Marinou V; Mentzel HJ; Sauer H; Schlösser RG
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 59(10):958-65. PubMed ID: 16458263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduced Stroop interference for opponent colors may be due to input factors: evidence from individual differences and a neural network simulation.
    Laeng B; Låg T; Brennen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):438-52. PubMed ID: 15982124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.