These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19914659)

  • 1. Comparison of flank, dorsal lumbotomy and laparoscopic approaches for dismembered pyeloplasty in children older than 3 years with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Mahdi M; Salle JL; Khoury AE; Farhat WA
    J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 19914659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.
    Troxel S; Das S; Helfer E; Nugyen M
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1073-6. PubMed ID: 16890693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Keays M; Farhat WA; Khoury AE; Salle JL
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. PubMed ID: 18708226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
    Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Zhang X; Li HZ; Ma X; Zheng T; Lang B; Zhang J; Fu B; Xu K; Guo XL
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 16890694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome based comparison of surgical approaches for pediatric pyeloplasty: dorsal lumbar versus flank incision.
    Wiener JS; Roth DR
    J Urol; 1998 Jun; 159(6):2116-9. PubMed ID: 9598553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.
    Chiancone F; Fedelini M; Pucci L; Meccariello C; Fedelini P
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 28191792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty in Children: Results of a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial.
    Gatti JM; Amstutz SP; Bowlin PR; Stephany HA; Murphy JP
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):792-797. PubMed ID: 27765696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in five pediatric cases of pelvic kidneys.
    Muller CO; Blanc T; Peycelon M; El Ghoneimi A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):353.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26233554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Wang X; Zhang Z; Peng N; Liu C
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 24004873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Wu JT; Gao ZL; Shi L; Han BM; Men CP; Zhang P; Xia SJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(22):2728-32. PubMed ID: 19951604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
    Xu W; Li H; Ji Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Xiao H; Liu G
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
    Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short stay pyeloplasty with transverse dorsal lumbotomy incision: our 10-year experience.
    Onol FF; Akbaş A; Köse O; Onol SY
    Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1309-12. PubMed ID: 19819531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient.
    Casale P; Grady RW; Joyner BD; Zeltser IS; Figueroa TE; Mitchell ME
    J Endourol; 2004 Nov; 18(9):875-8. PubMed ID: 15659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of surgical approach and urinary diversion on patient outcomes in pediatric pyeloplasty.
    Bayne AP; Lee KA; Nelson ED; Cisek LJ; Gonzales ET; Roth DR
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1693-8. PubMed ID: 21862074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery.
    Basiri A; Behjati S; Zand S; Moghaddam SM
    J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1045-51; discussion 1051. PubMed ID: 17941785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Miniature pyeloplasty as a minimally invasive surgery with less than 1 day admission in infants.
    Kajbafzadeh AM; Tourchi A; Nezami BG; Khakpour M; Mousavian AA; Talab SS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2011 Jun; 7(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 21527237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.