BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19914926)

  • 1. Twenty-six-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley standard profile pericardial aortic valve.
    Honda K; Okamura Y; Nishimura Y; Uchita S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):315-6. PubMed ID: 19914926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term clinical results with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
    Masters RG; Pipe AL; Bedard JP; Brais MP; Goldstein WG; Koshal A; Keon WJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 1986173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stented within a stentless aortic valve. A simple surgical solution for the replacement of a stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Panagiotou M; Kogerakis N; Crockett JR; Economidou S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 19805504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unusual 25-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Fiore A; Cooley DA; Grande AM; Viganò M; Angelini P
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Apr; 91(4):e52-3. PubMed ID: 21440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of pannus in the longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Butany JW; Kesarwani R; Yau TM; Singh G; Thangaroopan M; Nair V; Leong SW
    J Card Surg; 2006; 21(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 16948773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis in patients younger than 60 years.
    Yankah CA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 140(5):e83-4. PubMed ID: 20708752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioprosthetic durability assessment: importance of complete data.
    Jamieson WR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 141(2):596; author reply 596-7. PubMed ID: 21241868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The pericardial valve in the aortic position ten years later.
    Gonzalez-Lavin L; Gonzalez-Lavin J; Chi S; Lewis B; Amini S; Graf D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 1986172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting a 20-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Suyker WJ; Leicher FG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1354-5. PubMed ID: 20412969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcome of the MitroFlow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement.
    Sjögren J; Gudbjartsson T; Thulin LI
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 16607900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless pericardial xenografts: a propensity-matched analysis.
    D'Onofrio A; Cresce GD; Bolgan I; Magagna P; Piccin C; Auriemma S; Fabbri A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):319-25; discussion 326. PubMed ID: 21714424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of atrioventricular valves with photo-oxidized bovine pericardium.
    Verbrugghe P; Meuris B; Flameng W; Herijgers P
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 9(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 19684031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unexpected long durability of a low-profile porcine Liotta bioprosthesis in mitral position.
    Campanella A; Comoglio C; Sansone F; Rinaldi M
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2009 Jun; 10(6):492-3. PubMed ID: 19346969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valve failure caused by cusp tears in low-profile Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
    Walley VM; Bédard P; Brais M; Keon WJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Apr; 93(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 3550298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve.
    Nakajima H; Aupart MR; Neville PH; Sirinelli AL; Meurisse YA; Marchand MA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1,037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position.
    Yankah CA; Schubel J; Buz S; Siniawski H; Hetzer R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Mar; 14(2):172-9; discussion 179-80. PubMed ID: 15792176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Histologic and ultrastructural studies.
    Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; McAllister HA; Cooley DA
    Am J Pathol; 1992 May; 140(5):1195-204. PubMed ID: 1580331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.