These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1991579)

  • 1. Age discrimination in NIH peer review.
    Raub WF
    FASEB J; 1991 Jan; 5(1):116. PubMed ID: 1991579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
    Bucy PC
    Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 1988 Harry G. Armstrong lecture: contributions of NIH to aerospace medicine.
    Wyngaarden JB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 Mar; 60(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 2653303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH peer review of grant applications. Definitions, procedures, and suggestions.
    Wingate CL
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Apr; 28 Suppl 2():S38-40. PubMed ID: 8478186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH peer review system: facts and figures on study sections add up to trouble.
    Fed Proc; 1978 Aug; 37(10):1a-4a. PubMed ID: 581073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revamping NIH Study Sections.
    Lenard J
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):36. PubMed ID: 16400131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The NIH grants peer review system, present and future.
    Kirschstein RL; Solowey M
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1978 Apr; 33(4):147-9, 153. PubMed ID: 205568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
    Bondurant S
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF.
    Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NSF probes peer review; NIH investigates awards.
    Change; 1976 Feb; 8(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 1030336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science policy. The NIH budget in the "postdoubling" era.
    Korn D; Rich RR; Garrison HH; Golub SH; Hendrix MJ; Heinig SJ; Masters BS; Turman RJ
    Science; 2002 May; 296(5572):1401-2. PubMed ID: 12029114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into nonscientist involvement in peer review: the National Institutes of Health example.
    Brown T; Mauss EA; Schwarcz SL; Siekevitz P; Zucker M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 368():229-35. PubMed ID: 6942778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team.
    Looney GL
    Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research funding. NIH grantees: where have all the young ones gone?
    Goldman E; Marshall E
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):40-1. PubMed ID: 12364762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.