These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19916110)

  • 1. Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity from QSARs and interspecies correlations.
    Devillers J; Devillers H
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009 Jul; 20(5-6):467-500. PubMed ID: 19916110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity.
    Schultz TW; Carlson RE; Cronin MT; Hermens JL; Johnson R; O'Brien PJ; Roberts DW; Siraki A; Wallace KB; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):413-28. PubMed ID: 16920662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecotoxicity prediction using mechanism- and non-mechanism-based QSARs: a preliminary study.
    Ren S
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(9):1053-65. PubMed ID: 14512109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QSAR models for predicting the acute toxicity of selected organic chemicals with diverse structures to aquatic non-vertebrates and humans.
    Calleja MC; Geladi P; Persoone G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(3):193-234. PubMed ID: 8790646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing.
    Gubbels-van Hal WM; Blaauboer BJ; Barentsen HM; Hoitink MA; Meerts IA; van der Hoeven JC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Aug; 42(3):284-95. PubMed ID: 15979772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of DEMETRA individual QSARs with an index for evaluation of uncertainty.
    Porcelli C; Roncaglioni A; Chana A; Benfenati E
    Chemosphere; 2008 May; 71(10):1845-52. PubMed ID: 18384837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling acute oral mammalian toxicity. 1. Definition of a quantifiable baseline effect.
    Koleva YK; Cronin MT; Madden JC; Schwöbel JA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1281-93. PubMed ID: 21557997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute toxicity tests on 113 environmental chemicals.
    Hasegawa R; Nakaji Y; Kurokawa Y; Tobe M
    Sci Rep Res Inst Tohoku Univ Med; 1989 Dec; 36(1-4):10-6. PubMed ID: 2640064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative structure-activity-activity and quantitative structure-activity investigations of human and rodent toxicity.
    Lessigiarska I; Worth AP; Netzeva TI; Dearden JC; Cronin MT
    Chemosphere; 2006 Dec; 65(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 16714047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of the international workshops on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in environmental toxicology.
    Kaiser KL
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):3-20. PubMed ID: 17365955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
    Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ecotoxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships for alcohol ethoxylate mixtures based on substance-specific toxicity predictions.
    Boeije GM; Cano ML; Marshall SJ; Belanger SE; Van Compernolle R; Dorn PB; Gümbel H; Toy R; Wind T
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 May; 64(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 16256196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Per- and polyfluoro toxicity (LC(50) inhalation) study in rat and mouse using QSAR modeling.
    Bhhatarai B; Gramatica P
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 23(3):528-39. PubMed ID: 20095582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The electronic factor in QSAR: MO-parameters, competing interactions, reactivity and toxicity.
    Mekenyan OG; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):129-43. PubMed ID: 8790643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of acute toxicity of selected chemicals to rainbow trout and rats.
    Delistraty D; Taylor B; Anderson R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Mar; 39(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 9570910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What can be learnt from an ecotoxicity database in the framework of the REACh regulation?
    Henegar A; Mombelli E; Pandard P; Péry AR
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 21093016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.