BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19916305)

  • 1. [The IntegRIS radiological information system for digital mammography].
    Kochetova GP; Rozhkova NI; Belle TS
    Med Tekh; 2009; (5):42-5. PubMed ID: 19916305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Equipment for digital mammography].
    Blinov NN; Kozlovskiĭ ÉB; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2014; (5):1-4. PubMed ID: 25543389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The design of near infrared mammography computer-aided diagnosis system].
    Zhan CA; Feng HQ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Nov; 25(6):324-7. PubMed ID: 12583262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental investigations at the new digital mammographic system].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Aichinger U; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Nov; 175(11):1564-6. PubMed ID: 14610710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system.
    Yaffe MJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8302210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
    Dhaenens F
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 2001 mammography and CAD survey.
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(3):56. PubMed ID: 11496840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Waldrop SM; D'Orsi CJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Mar; 17(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 15255520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial recurrence analysis: a sensitive and fast detection tool in digital mammography.
    Prado TL; Galuzio PP; Lopes SR; Viana RL
    Chaos; 2014 Mar; 24(1):013106. PubMed ID: 24697368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital mammography and computer assisted diagnosis].
    Stines J; Noël A; Lévy L; Séradour B; Heid P
    J Radiol; 2002 Apr; 83(4 Pt 2):581-90. PubMed ID: 12075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Minimally invasive stereotactic breast biopsy with the "mammotome". Methodology and personal experiences].
    Laufer U; Frentzel K; Knoben B; Kirchner J; Donnerstag F; Liermann D
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():63-5. PubMed ID: 10063576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomographic laser mammography, a practical review.
    Richter DM
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 12881671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography.
    Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):871-84, vi. PubMed ID: 15337422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.