441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19916561)
1. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jan; 9(1):605-10. PubMed ID: 19916561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectral library searching for peptide identification via tandem MS.
Lam H; Aebersold R
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():95-103. PubMed ID: 20013366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Eddes JS; Eng JK; King N; Stein SE; Aebersold R
Proteomics; 2007 Mar; 7(5):655-67. PubMed ID: 17295354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An improved method for the construction of decoy peptide MS/MS spectra suitable for the accurate estimation of false discovery rates.
Ahrné E; Ohta Y; Nikitin F; Scherl A; Lisacek F; Müller M
Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(20):4085-95. PubMed ID: 21898822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectrum-based method to generate good decoy libraries for spectral library searching in peptide identifications.
Cheng CY; Tsai CF; Chen YJ; Sung TY; Hsu WL
J Proteome Res; 2013 May; 12(5):2305-10. PubMed ID: 23560440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tandem mass spectrometry spectral libraries and library searching.
Deutsch EW
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():225-32. PubMed ID: 21063950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Building and searching tandem mass (MS/MS) spectral libraries for peptide identification in proteomics.
Lam H; Aebersold R
Methods; 2011 Aug; 54(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 21277371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications.
Reidegeld KA; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Chamrad D; Körting G; Blüggel M; Meyer HE; Stephan C
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18338823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A semi-empirical approach for predicting unobserved peptide MS/MS spectra from spectral libraries.
Hu Y; Li Y; Lam H
Proteomics; 2011 Dec; 11(24):4702-11. PubMed ID: 22038894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches.
Zhang Z; Burke M; Mirokhin YA; Tchekhovskoi DV; Markey SP; Yu W; Chaerkady R; Hess S; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2018 Feb; 17(2):846-857. PubMed ID: 29281288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications by the MS2/MS3 target-decoy search strategy.
Jiang X; Han G; Feng S; Jiang X; Ye M; Yao X; Zou H
J Proteome Res; 2008 Apr; 7(4):1640-9. PubMed ID: 18314942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated approach for manual evaluation of peptides identified by searching protein sequence databases with tandem mass spectra.
Chen Y; Kwon SW; Kim SC; Zhao Y
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(3):998-1005. PubMed ID: 15952748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra.
Elias JE; Gibbons FD; King OD; Roth FP; Gygi SP
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 14730315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding the improved sensitivity of spectral library searching over sequence database searching in proteomics data analysis.
Zhang X; Li Y; Shao W; Lam H
Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1075-85. PubMed ID: 21298786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Search and decoy: the automatic identification of mass spectra.
Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Turewicz M; Koch MH; Uszkoreit J; Stephan C
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():445-88. PubMed ID: 22665317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refining similarity scoring to enable decoy-free validation in spectral library searching.
Shao W; Zhu K; Lam H
Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 13(22):3273-83. PubMed ID: 24115759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets.
Käll L; Canterbury JD; Weston J; Noble WS; MacCoss MJ
Nat Methods; 2007 Nov; 4(11):923-5. PubMed ID: 17952086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms.
Colaert N; Degroeve S; Helsens K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5555-61. PubMed ID: 21995378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification.
Cerqueira FR; Graber A; Schwikowski B; Baumgartner C
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear fitting method for determining local false discovery rates from decoy database searches.
Tang WH; Shilov IV; Seymour SL
J Proteome Res; 2008 Sep; 7(9):3661-7. PubMed ID: 18700793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
