180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19917885)
1. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease.
Watkins S; McGeoch R; Lyne J; Steedman T; Good R; McLaughlin MJ; Cunningham T; Bezlyak V; Ford I; Dargie HJ; Oldroyd KG
Circulation; 2009 Dec; 120(22):2207-13. PubMed ID: 19917885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses.
Pijls NH; De Bruyne B; Peels K; Van Der Voort PH; Bonnier HJ; Bartunek J Koolen JJ; Koolen JJ
N Engl J Med; 1996 Jun; 334(26):1703-8. PubMed ID: 8637515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion.
Paetsch I; Jahnke C; Wahl A; Gebker R; Neuss M; Fleck E; Nagel E
Circulation; 2004 Aug; 110(7):835-42. PubMed ID: 15289384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with angina pectoris but normal coronary angiograms assessed by intracoronary acetylcholine testing.
Yilmaz A; Athanasiadis A; Mahrholdt H; Voehringer M; Ong P; Hill S; Kispert EM; Seebo M; Sechtem U
Heart; 2010 Mar; 96(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 19934103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft lesions using fractional flow reserve.
Aqel R; Zoghbi GJ; Hage F; Dell'Italia L; Iskandrian AE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Oct; 72(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 18814221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Futamatsu H; Wilke N; Klassen C; Shoemaker S; Angiolillo DJ; Siuciak A; Morikawa-Futamatsu K; Suzuki N; von Ziegler F; Bass TA; Costa MA
Am Heart J; 2007 Aug; 154(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 17643580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by T2-prepared steady-state free precession blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to fractional flow reserve.
Walcher T; Manzke R; Hombach V; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J; Bernhardt P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 22855554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Combined evaluation of myocardial perfusion and contractility by cardiac magnetic resonance with adenosine stress test: feasibility and accuracy in detecting coronary artery disease].
Dellegrottaglie S; Cospite V; Pedrotti P; Pedretti S; Lanzarin B; Mauri F; Roghi A
G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2009 Feb; 10(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 19348147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging.
Jahnke C; Nagel E; Gebker R; Kokocinski T; Kelle S; Manka R; Fleck E; Paetsch I
Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1769-76. PubMed ID: 17353441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractional flow reserve of infarct-related arteries identifies reversible defects on noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging early after myocardial infarction.
Samady H; Lepper W; Powers ER; Wei K; Ragosta M; Bishop GG; Sarembock IJ; Gimple L; Watson DD; Beller GA; Barringhaus KG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 47(11):2187-93. PubMed ID: 16750683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head to head comparison between perfusion and function during accelerated high-dose dipyridamole magnetic resonance stress for the detection of coronary artery disease.
Pingitore A; Lombardi M; Scattini B; De Marchi D; Aquaro GD; Positano V; Picano E
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 101(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18157957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].
Wacker CM; Bauer WR
Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 12669220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Sampaio F; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Portugal P; Gama V; Nagel E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 23833284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.
Lachance P; Déry JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Potvin JM; Barbeau G; Bertrand OF; Gleeton O; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; De Larochellière R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18928947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
