180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19917885)
41. Is functional assessment necessary in patients with stable angina?
Heyndrickx GR
EuroIntervention; 2010 May; 6 Suppl G():G101-6. PubMed ID: 20542815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve with poststenotic coronary flow velocity reserve for prediction of stress myocardial perfusion imaging results.
Tron C; Donohue TJ; Bach RG; Aguirre FV; Caracciolo EA; Wolford TL; Miller DD; Kern MJ
Am Heart J; 1995 Oct; 130(4):723-33. PubMed ID: 7572579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Assessment of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with coronary angiography].
Pons Lladó G; Carreras F; Leta R; Pujadas S; García Picart J
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2004 May; 57(5):388-95. PubMed ID: 15151772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluating myocardial viability after myocardial infarction].
Meng ZH; Ding YQ; Quan XY; Xu X; Tang LQ; Ma SC; Pan GS; Lu YL; Chen ZS; Lei SF; Yang A
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Mar; 29(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 19304522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
Daniels DV; Fearon WF
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jan; 77(1):128-31. PubMed ID: 20506131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Correlation between thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects and the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis as assessed by pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve.
Yanagisawa H; Chikamori T; Tanaka N; Hatano T; Morishima T; Hida S; Iino H; Amaya K; Takazawa K; Yamashina A
Circ J; 2002 Dec; 66(12):1105-9. PubMed ID: 12499614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of cardiogoniometry and electrocardiography with perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and late gadolinium enhancement.
Birkemeyer R; Toelg R; Zeymer U; Wessely R; Jäckle S; Hairedini B; Lübke M; Aßfalg M; Jung W
Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1793-8. PubMed ID: 22791298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The value of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for patients referred from the adult congenital heart disease clinic: 5-year experience at the Toronto General Hospital.
Deva DP; Torres FS; Wald RM; Roche SL; Jimenez-Juan L; Oechslin EN; Crean AM
Cardiol Young; 2014 Oct; 24(5):822-30. PubMed ID: 24044501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial.
Bech GJ; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; de Muinck ED; Hoorntje JC; Escaned J; Stella PR; Boersma E; Bartunek J; Koolen JJ; Wijns W
Circulation; 2001 Jun; 103(24):2928-34. PubMed ID: 11413082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease.
Nagel E; Klein C; Paetsch I; Hettwer S; Schnackenburg B; Wegscheider K; Fleck E
Circulation; 2003 Jul; 108(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 12860910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Cardiac magnetic resonance stress perfusion: a single-center study].
Donato P; Ferreira MJ; Silva V; Pinto A; Caseiro-Alves F; Providência LA
Rev Port Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 32(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23201109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fractional flow reserve: concepts, applications and use in France in 2010.
Puymirat É; Muller O; Sharif F; Dupouy P; Cuisset T; de Bruyne B; Gilard M
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2010; 103(11-12):615-22. PubMed ID: 21147446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mismatch between results of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements and myocardial perfusion SPECT for identification of the severity of ischemia: pitfall of FFR in patients with prior myocardial infarction.
Tani S; Watanabe I; Kobari C; Matsumoto M; Miyazawa T; Iwamoto Y; Tsutsui A; Hagikura K; Furuichi T; Matsumoto N; Sato Y; Kushiro T; Nagao K; Kanmatsuse K
Jpn Heart J; 2004 Sep; 45(5):867-72. PubMed ID: 15557728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease: the potential role of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance.
Plein S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Apr; 2(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 19580727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Development of an Ex Vivo, Beating Heart Model for CT Myocardial Perfusion.
Pelgrim GJ; Das M; Haberland U; Slump C; Handayani A; van Tuijl S; Stijnen M; Klotz E; Oudkerk M; Wildberger JE; Vliegenthart R
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():412716. PubMed ID: 26185756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Stress perfusion imaging using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a review.
Christiansen JP; Karamitsos TD; Myerson SG; Francis JM; Neubauer S
Heart Lung Circ; 2010 Dec; 19(12):697-705. PubMed ID: 20869310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can measures of coronary dynamics explain chest pain without coronary artery disease?
Cannon RO
Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Dec; 73(12):1226-8. PubMed ID: 9868424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Myocardial bridging and fractional flow reserve].
Hernández-García JM; Alonso-Briales JH; de Teresa E
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):1117. PubMed ID: 16185622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The delay of contrast arrival in magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: a novel non-invasive parameter detecting collateral-dependent myocardium.
Muehling OM; Huber A; Cyran C; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Steinbeck G; Nabauer M; Jerosch-Herold M
Heart; 2007 Jul; 93(7):842-7. PubMed ID: 17344328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Myocardial perfusion by first pass contrast magnetic resonance: a robust method for quantitative regional assessment of perfusion reserve index.
Positano V; Pingitore A; Scattini B; Santarelli MF; De Marchi D; Favilli B; Lombardi M; Landini L
Heart; 2006 May; 92(5):689-90. PubMed ID: 16614289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
