These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19918109)

  • 1. Perception of electrical and mechanical stimulation of the skin: implications for electrotactile feedback.
    Marcus PL; Fuglevand AJ
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):066008. PubMed ID: 19918109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Material Roughness Modulation via Electrotactile Augmentation.
    Yoshimoto S; Kuroda Y; Imura M; Oshiro O
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2015; 8(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 25794397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Tactile Sensation by Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation.
    Yem V; Kajimoto H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(1):130-134. PubMed ID: 28113382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-Parameter Modulation Improves Stimulus Localization in Multichannel Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Seminara L; Fares H; Franceschi M; Valle M; Strbac M; Farina D; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 31675343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial localization of electrotactile stimuli on the fingertip in humans.
    Bobich LR; Warren JP; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI; Santello M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2007 Dec; 24(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 18097991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Encoding contact size using static and dynamic electrotactile finger stimulation: natural decoding vs. trained cues.
    Henrich MC; Garenfeld MA; Malesevic J; Strbac M; Dosen S
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 May; 242(5):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 38467759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing Non-Somatotopic Phantom Finger Sensation to Comparable Levels of Somatotopic Sensation through User Training With Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Chai G; Zhang D; Zhu X
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 May; 25(5):469-480. PubMed ID: 27323369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HyVE-hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation-is an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback.
    D'Alonzo M; Dosen S; Cipriani C; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014; 7(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 24968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why the whole is more than the sum of its parts: Salience-driven overestimation in aggregated tactile sensations.
    Cataldo A; Ferrè ER; di Pellegrino G; Haggard P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2509-2526. PubMed ID: 30971159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical and psychophysical studies of surface wave propagation during vibrotactile stimulation.
    Sofia KO; Jones LA
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 24808328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortical response to mechanical tactile stimuli.
    Hadoush H; Inoue K; Nakanishi K; Kurumadani H; Sunagawa T; Ochi M
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jan; 21(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 19997038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual improvement following repetitive sensory stimulation depends monotonically on stimulation intensity.
    Schlieper S; Dinse HR
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Oct; 5(4):647-51. PubMed ID: 21962984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-frequency electrical stimulation of the human skin induces heterotopical mechanical hyperalgesia, heat hyperalgesia, and enhanced responses to nonnociceptive vibrotactile input.
    van den Broeke EN; Mouraux A
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 111(8):1564-73. PubMed ID: 24453277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel Electrode Designs for Electrotactile Stimulation of the Finger: A Comparative Assessment.
    Garenfeld MA; Henrich MC; Isakovic M; Malesevic J; Strbac M; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2023; 16(4):748-759. PubMed ID: 37801385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Receptive field characteristics under electrotactile stimulation of the fingertip.
    Warren JP; Bobich LR; Santello M; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Aug; 16(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 18713678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile perception: do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?
    Warren JP; Tillery SI
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Nov; 505(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21575679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conductive block copolymer elastomers and psychophysical thresholding for accurate haptic effects.
    Blau R; Abdal A; Root N; Chen AX; Rafeedi T; Ramji R; Qie Y; Kim T; Navarro A; Chin J; Becerra LL; Edmunds SJ; Russman SM; Dayeh SA; Fenning DP; Rouw R; Lipomi DJ
    Sci Robot; 2024 Jun; 9(91):eadk3925. PubMed ID: 38865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vibrotactile and electrotactile perception of time-varying pulse trains.
    Summers IR; Dixon PR; Cooper PG; Gratton DA; Brown BH; Stevens JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1548-58. PubMed ID: 8176058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object Shape and Surface Topology Recognition Using Tactile Feedback Evoked through Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation.
    Vargas L; Huang H; Zhu Y; Hu X
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(1):152-158. PubMed ID: 31976905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.