78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19919889)
1. Preoperative assessment of complete tumour resection by magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.
Forner DM; Meyer A; Lampe B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 19919889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis.
Dumontier I; Roseau G; Vincent B; Chapron C; Dousset B; Chaussade S; Moreau JF; Dubuisson JB; Couturier D
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11173733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
Brown G; Radcliffe AG; Newcombe RG; Dallimore NS; Bourne MW; Williams GT
Br J Surg; 2003 Mar; 90(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 12594673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study.
MERCURY Study Group
BMJ; 2006 Oct; 333(7572):779. PubMed ID: 16984925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.
Ortashi O; Jain S; Emannuel O; Henry R; Wood A; Evans J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 17537566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI at the completion of chemoradiotherapy can accurately evaluate the extent of disease in women with advanced urethral carcinoma undergoing anterior pelvic exenteration.
Gourtsoyianni S; Hudolin T; Sala E; Goldman D; Bochner BH; Hricak H
Clin Radiol; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1072-8. PubMed ID: 21839430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mesorectal lymph node involvement and prognostic implications at total pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.
Mourton SM; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Alektiar KM; Venkatraman ES; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Mar; 100(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 16226800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer.
Soutter WP; Hanoch J; D'Arcy T; Dina R; McIndoe GA; DeSouza NM
BJOG; 2004 Jul; 111(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15198766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status.
Kulkarni T; Gollins S; Maw A; Hobson P; Byrne R; Widdowson D
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jun; 10(5):479-89. PubMed ID: 18318754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reliability of imaging procedures in multi-visceral gynecologic operations of the pelvis].
Brumm C; Mitze M; Knapstein PG; Düber C; Grebe P; Thelen M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 54(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 8013857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer.
Martling A; Holm T; Bremmer S; Lindholm J; Cedermark B; Blomqvist L
Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1422-8. PubMed ID: 14598425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low colorectal anastomosis after radical pelvic surgery: a risk factor analysis.
Mirhashemi R; Averette HE; Estape R; Angioli R; Mahran R; Mendez L; Cantuaria G; Penalver M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 183(6):1375-9; discussion 1379-80. PubMed ID: 11120499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors for long-term survival after interdisciplinary salvage surgery for advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancers.
Fleisch MC; Pantke P; Beckmann MW; Schnuerch HG; Ackermann R; Grimm MO; Bender HG; Dall P
J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 17192947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit.
Videhult P; Smedh K; Lundin P; Kraaz W
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 17504337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Han SS; Lee SH; Kim DH; Kim JW; Park NH; Kang SB; Song YS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010; 89(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19916890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.
Boyle KM; Petty D; Chalmers AG; Quirke P; Cairns A; Finan PJ; Sagar PM; Burke D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 15859960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent gynaecological malignancies.
de Wilt JH; van Leeuwen DH; Logmans A; Verhoef C; Kirkels WJ; Vermaas M; Ansink AC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 16950559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of MR imaging in determining surgical eligibility for pelvic exenteration.
Popovich MJ; Hricak H; Sugimura K; Stern JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 8430546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
