269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19919894)
1. Structural analysis of biofilms and pellets of Aspergillus niger by confocal laser scanning microscopy and cryo scanning electron microscopy.
Villena GK; Fujikawa T; Tsuyumu S; Gutiérrez-Correa M
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(6):1920-6. PubMed ID: 19919894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging of endodontic biofilms by combined microscopy (FISH/cLSM - SEM).
Schaudinn C; Carr G; Gorur A; Jaramillo D; Costerton JW; Webster P
J Microsc; 2009 Aug; 235(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 19659906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confocal imaging of biofilm formation process using fluoroprobed Escherichia coli and fluoro-stained exopolysaccharide.
Maeyama R; Mizunoe Y; Anderson JM; Tanaka M; Matsuda T
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Aug; 70(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 15227672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Production of cellulase by Aspergillus niger biofilms developed on polyester cloth.
Villena GK; Gutiérrez-Correa M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 43(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 16910929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oxygen profiles and biomass distribution in biopellets of Aspergillus niger.
Hille A; Neu TR; Hempel DC; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Dec; 92(5):614-23. PubMed ID: 16136592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Architectural analysis, viability assessment and growth kinetics of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms.
Seneviratne CJ; Silva WJ; Jin LJ; Samaranayake YH; Samaranayake LP
Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(11):1052-60. PubMed ID: 19712926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional biofilm structure quantification.
Beyenal H; Donovan C; Lewandowski Z; Harkin G
J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Dec; 59(3):395-413. PubMed ID: 15488282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploiting advances in imaging technology to study biofilms by applying multiphoton laser scanning microscopy as an imaging and manipulation tool.
Lakins MA; Marrison JL; O'Toole PJ; van der Woude MW
J Microsc; 2009 Aug; 235(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19659907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring of microbial adhesion and biofilm growth using electrochemical impedancemetry.
Dheilly A; Linossier I; Darchen A; Hadjiev D; Corbel C; Alonso V
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 May; 79(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 18330564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric measurements of bacterial cells and extracellular polymeric substance glycoconjugates in biofilms.
Staudt C; Horn H; Hempel DC; Neu TR
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Dec; 88(5):585-92. PubMed ID: 15470707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of the mesoscale structure and volumetric features of biofilms using optical coherence tomography.
Wagner M; Taherzadeh D; Haisch C; Horn H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Dec; 107(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 20717977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Demonstration of bacterial cells and glycocalyx in biofilms on human tonsils.
Kania RE; Lamers GE; Vonk MJ; Huy PT; Hiemstra PS; Bloemberg GV; Grote JJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17309977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaction between biofilm development, structure and detachment in rotating annular reactors.
Garny K; Horn H; Neu TR
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2008 Oct; 31(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 18320233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofilms on tracheoesophageal voice prostheses: a confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstration of mixed bacterial and yeast biofilms.
Kania RE; Lamers GE; van de Laar N; Dijkhuizen M; Lagendijk E; Huy PT; Herman P; Hiemstra P; Grote JJ; Frijns J; Bloemberg GV
Biofouling; 2010 Jul; 26(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 20473799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced visualization of microbial biofilms by staining and environmental scanning electron microscopy.
Priester JH; Horst AM; Van de Werfhorst LC; Saleta JL; Mertes LA; Holden PA
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 17196692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Investigation of the structure of biofilms formed by sulfur cycle bacteria on metal matrices].
Protasova MO; Lazariev VH; Kozlova IP
Mikrobiol Z; 2006; 68(5):80-6. PubMed ID: 17388123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of three-dimensional biofilm models through direct comparison with confocal microscopy imaging.
Xavier JB; Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):177-85. PubMed ID: 15303739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of 3D architecture of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis batch culture biofilms-A quantitative confocal microscopy approach.
Schlapp G; Scavone P; Zunino P; Härtel S
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Nov; 87(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 21864585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structure of Proteus mirabilis biofilms grown in artificial urine and standard laboratory media.
Jones SM; Yerly J; Hu Y; Ceri H; Martinuzzi R
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Mar; 268(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17250761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a solution containing citrate/Methylene Blue/parabens on Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and biofilm, and comparison with various heparin solutions.
Sauer K; Steczko J; Ash SR
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 May; 63(5):937-45. PubMed ID: 19282330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
