These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19919897)

  • 1. Mobile bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Pandit H; Jenkins C; Beard DJ; Price AJ; Gill HS; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):392-7. PubMed ID: 19919897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases.
    Pandit H; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21282759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mid-term outcomes of the Oxford Domed Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Weston-Simons JS; Pandit H; Kendrick BJ; Jenkins C; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Jan; 96-B(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 24395312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobile-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford domed tibial component: an independent series.
    Streit MR; Walker T; Bruckner T; Merle C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M; Aldinger PR; Gotterbarm T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Oct; 94(10):1356-61. PubMed ID: 23015560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings.
    Buechel FF; Pappas MJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1989 Apr; 20(2):147-77. PubMed ID: 2922189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early complications after minimally invasive mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Song MH; Kim BH; Ahn SJ; Yoo SH; Lee MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1281-4. PubMed ID: 19729271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary meniscal-bearing knee replacements: 8- to 15-year followup.
    Hartford JM; Harned ME; Kaufer H; Dobner JJ; Nicholls PJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():227-31. PubMed ID: 17828026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre.
    Altuntas AO; Alsop H; Cobb JP
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 23274066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review and meta-analysis of bearing dislocation in lateral meniscal bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: Domed versus flat tibial surface.
    Yang I; Hamilton TW; Mellon SJ; Murray DW
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():214-228. PubMed ID: 33422937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mid-term results of lateral unicondylar mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study of 363 cases.
    Walker T; Zahn N; Bruckner T; Streit MR; Mohr G; Aldinger PR; Clarius M; Gotterbarm T
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29305449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].
    Endres S; Steinheiser E; Wilke A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 16224679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten-year survival and seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A prospective consecutive series of our first 1000 cases.
    Campi S; Pandit H; Hooper G; Snell D; Jenkins C; Dodd CAF; Maxwell R; Murray DW
    Knee; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1231-1237. PubMed ID: 30150067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of dislocation of the domed Oxford Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.
    Weston-Simons JS; Kendrick BJ; Mentink MJ; Pandit H; Gill HS; Murray DW
    Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):304-9. PubMed ID: 23673196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral fixation pattern in cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty--an experimental cadaver study.
    Clarius M; Mohr G; Jaeger S; Seeger JB; Bitsch RG
    Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):398-402. PubMed ID: 20006930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation.
    Tria AJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 15062708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic evaluation of factors affecting bearing dislocation in the domed lateral Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Gulati A; Weston-Simons S; Evans D; Jenkins C; Gray H; Dodd CA; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1254-7. PubMed ID: 25216805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning curve with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Hamilton WG; Ammeen D; Engh CA; Engh GA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 19577895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo determination of kinematics for subjects having a Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System.
    Akizuki S; Mueller JK; Horiuchi H; Matsunaga D; Shibakawa A; Komistek RD
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):963-71. PubMed ID: 18701238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Hopkins AR; New AM; Rodriguez-y-Baena F; Taylor M
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19897397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment knee disease: 2 to 5 year follow-up.
    Heller S; Fenichel I; Salai M; Luria T; Velkes S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 May; 11(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 19637502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.