177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19920309)
1. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Major reduction of monitor units with the avoidance of leaf-sequencing step by direct aperture based IMRT optimisation.
Seppälä J; Lahtinen T; Kolmonen P
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 18766997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of breast cancer using direct aperture optimization.
van Asselen B; Schwarz M; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Radiother Oncol; 2006 May; 79(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 16712992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-segmented 2-Step IMRT with subsequent direct machine parameter optimisation - a planning study.
Bratengeier K; Meyer J; Flentje M
Radiat Oncol; 2008 Nov; 3():38. PubMed ID: 18990227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of anatomy-based, fluence-based and aperture-based treatment planning approaches for VMAT.
Rao M; Cao D; Chen F; Ye J; Mehta V; Wong T; Shepard D
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6475-90. PubMed ID: 20959688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
