728 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19920807)
1. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and tolerability of alosetron for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in women and men: a meta-analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials.
Rahimi R; Nikfar S; Abdollahi M
Clin Ther; 2008 May; 30(5):884-901. PubMed ID: 18555935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral health promotion reduces plaque and gingival bleeding in the short term.
Hausen H
Evid Based Dent; 2005; 6(2):31. PubMed ID: 16208381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
Kranke P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit.
Bassler D; Ferreira-Gonzalez I; Briel M; Cook DJ; Devereaux PJ; Heels-Ansdell D; Kirpalani H; Meade MO; Montori VM; Rozenberg A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 17689802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: quality of systematic reviews.
de Bot CM; Moed H; Berger MY; Röder E; van Wijk RG; van der Wouden JC
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2011 Sep; 22(6):548-58. PubMed ID: 21919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting 'number needed to treat' in meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.
Naing C; Aung K; Mak JW
J Evid Based Med; 2012 Nov; 5(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 23557504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture for stroke.
Zhang JH; Wang D; Liu M
Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 24356063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
Burton M; Clarke M
Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects.
Pereira TV; Ioannidis JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1060-9. PubMed ID: 21454050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
