78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19922095)
1. Implementation of perceptual channels in children implanted with a HiRes 90K device.
Mancini P; Bosco E; D'agosta L; Traisci G; Nicastri M; Capelli G; Ballantyne D; Filipo R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 129(12):1442-50. PubMed ID: 19922095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Han D; Liu B; Zhou N; Chen X; Kong Y; Liu H; Zheng Y; Xu L
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 19194297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term study of the effect of speech coding strategy on the auditory performance of pre- and post-lingually deafened adults implanted with the Clarion CII.
Filipo R; Mancini P; Ballantyne D; Bosco E; D'Elia C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 15224855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.
Büchner A; Lenarz T; Boermans PP; Frijns JH; Mancini P; Filipo R; Fielden C; Cooper H; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Kienast B; Boyle P; Arnold L; Meyer B; Sterkers O; Müller-Deile J; Ambrosch P; Helbig S; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Jeffs E; Morant A; Marco J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 22074015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
