142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19922784)
1. Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 19922784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
Başkent D; Bazo D
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
Goverts ST; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.
Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T; Hudson M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 21599615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Jepsen ML; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Bellanova M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report.
Wilson RH; Strouse A
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 11926322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
Battmer RD; Dillier N; Lai WK; Begall K; Leypon EE; González JC; Manrique M; Morera C; Müller-Deile J; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Killian MJ; von Wallenberg E; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21319935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
