These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19922784)

  • 21. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing impairment and self-masking: listening during vocalization.
    Borg E; Wikström C; Gustafsson D
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 22686438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
    Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():23-9. PubMed ID: 2356732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
    Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Suppression and comodulation masking release in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ernst SM; Rennies J; Kollmeier B; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):300-9. PubMed ID: 20649225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Localization in speech mixtures by listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Carlile S; Kopco N; van Schaik A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL210-15. PubMed ID: 21568377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chang HW; Dillon H; Carter L; van Dun B; Young ST
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):663-70. PubMed ID: 22873205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL213-9. PubMed ID: 25698053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.
    Best V; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):81. PubMed ID: 28147587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.