169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19922923)
1. Characterization of forces applied by endoscopists during colonoscopy by using a wireless colonoscopy force monitor.
Korman LY; Egorov V; Tsuryupa S; Corbin B; Anderson M; Sarvazyan N; Sarvazyan A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Feb; 71(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 19922923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective Differences in Colonoscopy Technique Between Trainee and Expert Endoscopists Using the Colonoscopy Force Monitor.
Ende AR; De Groen P; Balmadrid BL; Hwang JH; Inadomi J; Wojtera T; Egorov V; Sarvazyan N; Korman L
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 29147876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.
Korman LY; Brandt LJ; Metz DC; Haddad NG; Benjamin SB; Lazerow SK; Miller HL; Greenwald DA; Desale S; Patel M; Sarvazyan A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Oct; 76(4):867-72. PubMed ID: 22840291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of propofol anesthesia on force application during colonoscopy.
Korman LY; Haddad NG; Metz DC; Brandt LJ; Benjamin SB; Lazerow SK; Miller HL; Mete M; Patel M; Egorov V
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Apr; 79(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 24472761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The measurement of forces exerted during colonoscopy.
Appleyard MN; Mosse CA; Mills TN; Bell GD; Castillo FD; Swain CP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Aug; 52(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10922101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Teshima CW; Zepeda-Gómez S; AlShankiti SH; Sandha GS
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 20(36):13178-84. PubMed ID: 25278714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a Robotic Colonoscopic Manipulation System, Using Haptic Feedback Algorithm.
Woo J; Choi JH; Seo JT; Kim TI; Yi BJ
Yonsei Med J; 2017 Jan; 58(1):139-143. PubMed ID: 27873506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.
Goudra B; Singh PM; Gouda G; Borle A; Carlin A; Yadwad A
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):551-7. PubMed ID: 26364193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
Dafnis GM
Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 10817176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Water-aided colonoscopy.
Anderson JC
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 25839683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of "transparent soft-short-hood on the scope" for colonoscopy among experienced gastroenterologists and gastroenterologist trainee: a randomized, controlled trial.
Prachayakul V; Aswakul P; Limsrivilai J; Anuchapreeda S; Bhanthumkomol P; Sripongpun P; Prangboonyarat T; Kachintorn U
Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1041-6. PubMed ID: 22042588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope.
Pasha SF; Harrison ME; Das A; Corrado CM; Arnell KN; Leighton JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 May; 65(6):848-53. PubMed ID: 17324408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of ancillary techniques to aid colonoscope insertion.
Xhaja X; Church J
Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1936-9. PubMed ID: 24566740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carbon dioxide insufflation does not reduce pain scores during colonoscope insertion in unsedated patients: a randomized, controlled trial.
Chen PJ; Li CH; Huang TY; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 23261097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single-center trial.
Falt P; Šmajstrla V; Fojtík P; Liberda M; Kliment M; Tvrdík J; Urban O
Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 23808948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of responsive insertion technology (RIT) on reducing discomfort during colonoscopy: randomized clinical trial.
Pasternak A; Szura M; Solecki R; Matyja M; Szczepanik A; Matyja A
Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2247-2254. PubMed ID: 27631316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
