These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19923482)

  • 1. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
    Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Shin BM; Kuak EY; Lee EJ; Songer JG
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2952-6. PubMed ID: 19625481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
    Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Sloan LM; Duresko BJ; Gustafson DR; Rosenblatt JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 18434563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Goldenberg SD; Cliff PR; Smith S; Milner M; French GL
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Jan; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19900734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.
    Sandlund J; Mills R; Griego-Fullbright C; Wagner A; Estis J; Bartolome A; Almazan A; Tam S; Biscocho S; Abusali S; Nolan N; Bishop JJ; Todd J; Young S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Sep; 95(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 31129008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.
    Stamper PD; Alcabasa R; Aird D; Babiker W; Wehrlin J; Ikpeama I; Carroll KC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 47(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 19073875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experience with laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile].
    Bareková L; Zálabská E; Hanovcová I
    Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2013 Sep; 19(3):91-5. PubMed ID: 24579451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.
    Stamper PD; Babiker W; Alcabasa R; Aird D; Wehrlin J; Ikpeama I; Gluck L; Carroll KC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3846-50. PubMed ID: 19846637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of four commercially available rapid enzyme immunoassays with cytotoxin assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin(s) from stool specimens.
    Merz CS; Kramer C; Forman M; Gluck L; Mills K; Senft K; Steiman I; Wallace N; Charache P
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1142-7. PubMed ID: 8051237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile.
    Shin BM; Lee EJ; Moon JW; Lee SY
    Anaerobe; 2016 Aug; 40():68-72. PubMed ID: 27282799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.
    Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.
    Boyanton BL; Sural P; Loomis CR; Pesta C; Gonzalez-Krellwitz L; Robinson-Dunn B; Riska P
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 50(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 22189114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.
    Eastwood K; Else P; Charlett A; Wilcox M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 47(10):3211-7. PubMed ID: 19710274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan.
    Chang FC; Liu CP; Sun FJ; Lin CC
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2021 Apr; 54(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 31624018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.
    Landry ML; Topal JE; Estis J; Katzenbach P; Nolan N; Sandlund J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31776192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a simultaneous detection kit for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxin A/B in feces for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Kawada M; Annaka M; Kato H; Shibasaki S; Hikosaka K; Mizuno H; Masuda Y; Inamatsu T
    J Infect Chemother; 2011 Dec; 17(6):807-11. PubMed ID: 21725661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.
    Senoh M; Kato H; Honda H; Fukuda T; Tagashira Y; Horiuchi H; Chiba H; Suzuki D; Hosokawa N; Kitazono H; Norisue Y; Kume H; Mori N; Morikawa H; Kashiwagura S; Higuchi A; Kato H; Nakamura M; Ishiguro S; Morita S; Ishikawa H; Watanabe T; Kojima K; Yokomaku I; Bando T; Toimoto K; Moriya K; Kasahara K; Kitada S; Ogawa J; Saito H; Tominaga H; Shimizu Y; Masumoto F; Tadera K; Yoshida J; Kikuchi T; Yoshikawa I; Watanabe T; Honda M; Yokote K; Toyokawa T; Miyazato H; Nakama M; Mahe C; Reske K; Olsen MA; Dubberke ER
    Anaerobe; 2019 Dec; 60():102107. PubMed ID: 31647977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.
    Fenner L; Widmer AF; Goy G; Rudin S; Frei R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):328-30. PubMed ID: 18032627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.