BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19923685)

  • 1. Measurements of the modulation transfer function, normalized noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency for two flat panel detectors: a fluoroscopic and a cone beam computer tomography flat panel detectors.
    Benítez RB; Ning R; Conover D; Liu S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 19923685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation.
    Ning R; Chen B; Yu R; Conover D; Tang X; Ning Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Sep; 19(9):949-63. PubMed ID: 11127608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications.
    Shen Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101915. PubMed ID: 24089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
    Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A spatio-temporal detective quantum efficiency and its application to fluoroscopic systems.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6061-9. PubMed ID: 21158318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NPS characterization and evaluation of a cone beam CT breast imaging system.
    Benítez RB; Ning R; Conover D; Liu S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(1):17-40. PubMed ID: 19644211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of kilovoltage x-ray beams used for cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 17327651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).
    Gomi T; Koshida K; Miyati T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 16763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.