167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19923772)
1. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.
Duran M; Yurtsever D; Dunaev T
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli through whole-cell fatty acid profiling to investigate host specificity.
Haznedaroglu BZ; Yurtsever D; Lefkowitz JR; Duran M
Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 17234236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbial source tracking using host specific FAME profiles of fecal coliforms.
Duran M; Haznedaroğlu BZ; Zitomer DH
Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16360192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.
Graves AK; Hagedorn C; Brooks A; Hagedorn RL; Martin E
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discriminant analysis of fecal bacterial species composition for use as a phenotypic microbial source tracking method.
Evenson CJ; Strevett KA
Res Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 157(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 16725314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carbon source utilization profiles as a method to identify sources of faecal pollution in water.
Hagedorn C; Crozier JB; Mentz KA; Booth AM; Graves AK; Nelson NJ; Reneau RB
J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 94(5):792-9. PubMed ID: 12694443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel application of a statistical technique, Random Forests, in a bacterial source tracking study.
Smith A; Sterba-Boatwright B; Mott J
Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4067-76. PubMed ID: 20566209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region in Enterococcus spp. for microbial source tracking.
Dickerson JW; Crozier JB; Hagedorn C; Hassall A
J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(6):1661-9. PubMed ID: 17940266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces.
Silkie SS; Nelson KL
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations when using discriminant function analysis of antimicrobial resistance profiles to identify sources of fecal contamination of surface water in Michigan.
Kaneene JB; Miller R; Sayah R; Johnson YJ; Gilliland D; Gardiner JC
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 May; 73(9):2878-90. PubMed ID: 17337537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of Enterococcus spp. from human and animal feces using 16S rRNA sequences, the esp gene, and PFGE for microbial source tracking in Korea.
Kim SY; Lee JE; Lee S; Lee HT; Hur HG; Ko G
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3423-8. PubMed ID: 20356091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples.
Griffith JF; Weisberg SB; McGee CD
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):141-51. PubMed ID: 15382720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from different fecal sources by means of classification tree analysis of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles.
Seurinck S; Deschepper E; Deboch B; Verstraete W; Siciliano S
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Mar; 114(1-3):433-45. PubMed ID: 16570218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization and validation of rep-PCR genotypic libraries for microbial source tracking of environmental Escherichia coli isolates.
Lyautey E; Lu Z; Lapen DR; Berkers TE; Edge TA; Topp E
Can J Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 56(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 20130688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
