BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19923871)

  • 1. Minimally invasive cochlear implantation with mastoidal three-layer flap technique.
    Ulug T; Teker AM
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 19923871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The suprameatal approach: a safe alternative surgical technique for cochlear implantation.
    Postelmans JT; Tange RA; Stokroos RJ; Grolman W
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 20009783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical outcomes of paediatric cochlear implantation: the Hospital for Sick Children's experience.
    de Jong AL; Nedzelski J; Papsin BC
    J Otolaryngol; 1998 Feb; 27(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 9511116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subperiosteal temporal pocket versus standard technique in cochlear implantation: a comparative clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Orhan KS; Yiğit O; Başaran B; Polat B; Güneş S; Acoğlu E; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 21725262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive approach and fixation of cochlear and middle ear implants.
    Jiang D; Bibas A; O'Connor AF
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Dec; 29(6):618-20. PubMed ID: 15533148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Four years' experience with the minimally invasive surgical approach in cochlear implant surgery.
    Mack KF; Heermann R; Issing PR; Lenarz T; Schwab B
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2006; 15(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 16785185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mini-incision for pediatric cochlear implantation with a MED-EL device.
    Bayazit YA; Goksu N; Ozbilen S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 17713358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new minimal approach in cochlear implant surgery: the Colombian experience.
    Almario JE; Lora JG; Prieto JA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Jul; 133(1):147-9. PubMed ID: 16025068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tailed Palva flap in the subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Güldiken Y
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Sep; 129(9):916-8. PubMed ID: 26314323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical outcome after paediatric cochlear implantation: diminution of complications with the evolution of new surgical techniques.
    Gysin C; Papsin BC; Daya H; Nedzelski J
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Oct; 29(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 11108487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal access surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing implant.
    Foyt D; Carfrae M
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The outcome of our modified double-flap technique for cochlear implantation: a case series of 342 consecutive patients.
    Alzoubi F; Odat H; Al Omari A; Al-Zuraiqi B
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 25029104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-sutured fixation of cochlear implants using a minimally-invasive approach.
    Loh C; Jiang D; Dezso A; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 33(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 18559035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation in children: our first 50 cases.
    Ramsden JD; Papsin BC; Leung R; James A; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2444-8. PubMed ID: 19718748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of Baha® implantation using a small horizontal incision.
    Brant JA; Gudis D; Ruckenstein MJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 23954161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External magnet displacement in cochlear implants: causes and management.
    Posner D; Scott A; Polite C; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 19924015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implantation surgery without posterior tympanotomy: can we still improve it?
    Guevara N; Bailleux S; Santini J; Castillo L; Gahide I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19714530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal access and standard cochlear implantation: a comparative study.
    Prager JD; Neidich MJ; Perkins JN; Meinzen-Derr J; Greinwald JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 76(8):1102-6. PubMed ID: 22595461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.