These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19924667)

  • 1. Amadeus II microkeratome: optimizing microkeratome settings for high flap accuracy using optical low coherence reflectometry.
    Lackerbauer CA; Kollias A; Kreutzer TC; Ulbig M; Kampik A; Grueterich M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19924667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of head advance and oscillation rate on the flap parameter: a comparison of two microkeratomes.
    Hoffmann S; Krummenauer F; Tehrani M; Dick HB
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 241(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12605270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Customizing the Amadeus II microkeratome: evaluation of cut quality with various settings using electron microscopy.
    Lackerbauer CA; Grueterich M; Kojetinsky C; Ulbig M; Kollias A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 19787592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and precision of the amadeus microkeratome in producing LASIK flaps.
    Jackson DW; Wang L; Koch DD
    Cornea; 2003 Aug; 22(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 12883340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blade source effect on laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness with the Amadeus I microkeratome.
    Ruth AL; Lynn MJ; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):407-10. PubMed ID: 18299064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.
    Zhou Y; Zhang J; Tian L; Zhai C
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 22373033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flap thickness accuracy: comparison of 6 microkeratome models.
    Solomon KD; Donnenfeld E; Sandoval HP; Al Sarraf O; Kasper TJ; Holzer MP; Slate EH; Vroman DT;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):964-77. PubMed ID: 15130631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of four microkeratome models: quality and reproducibility of cut edge and cut surface as determined by scanning electron microscopy.
    Hammer T; Hanschke R; Wörner I; Wilhelm FW
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(5):454-62. PubMed ID: 16209442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 single-use head 90 microkeratome.
    Huhtala A; Pietilä J; Mäkinen P; Suominen S; Seppänen M; Uusitalo H
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 17559465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of cut quality using the Amadeus microkeratome with different settings.
    Tehrani M; Schäfer S; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2415-9. PubMed ID: 15519098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome with zero compression heads.
    Taneri S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 16516782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 microkeratome.
    Muallem MS; Yoo SY; Romano AC; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1902-8. PubMed ID: 15342053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: flap dimensions with the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome using the 100-microm head.
    Duffey RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1159-62. PubMed ID: 16039490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Güell JL; Velasco F; Roberts C; Sisquella MT; Mahmoud A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15721703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of microkeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Rocha KM; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 27(10):759-63. PubMed ID: 21853960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 microkeratome and Med-Logics calibrated LASIK blades.
    Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Seppänen M; Jääskeläinen M; Uusitalo H
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 87(7):754-8. PubMed ID: 19456311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nidek MK 2000 microkeratome clinical evaluation.
    Arbelaez MC
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(3 Suppl):S357-60. PubMed ID: 12046882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the cut quality of the Masyk microkeratome in obtaining corneal flap from porcine eyes].
    Victor G; Alves MR; Nosé W
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16491226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noncontact optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal flap and residual stromal bed thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Thompson RW; Choi DM; Price MO; Potrezbowski L; Price FW
    J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 14518739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of varying microkeratome parameters on laser in situ keratomileusis interface surfaces.
    Sanka RK; Loft ES; Randleman JB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):493-6. PubMed ID: 20202551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.