These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment. Başkent D; Bazo D Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study. Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Willison HM; Freund MS J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):151. PubMed ID: 28764460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head. Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audio-visual integration in cochlear implant listeners and the effect of age difference. Zhou X; Innes-Brown H; McKay CM J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4144. PubMed ID: 31893708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). Potts LG; Skinner MW; Litovsky RA; Strube MJ; Kuk F J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):353-73. PubMed ID: 19594084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization. Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Xin Luo ; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 18003871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization. Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Nelson PB; Jin SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]