These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19925341)

  • 1. Relative importance of different spectral bands to consonant identification: relevance for frequency transposition in hearing aids.
    Vickers D; Robinson JD; Füllgrabe C; Baer T; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):334-45. PubMed ID: 19925341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of linear and warped spectral transposition on consonant identification by normal-hearing listeners with a simulated dead region.
    Füllgrabe C; Baer T; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):420-33. PubMed ID: 20180628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions.
    Ardoint M; Agus T; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21. PubMed ID: 21877769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Alexander JM; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of low-pass filtering on identification of nonsense syllables in quiet by school-age children with and without cochlear dead regions.
    Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baer T; Baker RJ; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):458-69. PubMed ID: 23337997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selectivity of modulation interference for consonant identification in normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1665-72. PubMed ID: 18345854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.
    Loizou PC; Dorman M; Poroy O; Spahr T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth.
    Füllgrabe C; Baer T; Stone MA; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):741-53. PubMed ID: 20672875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a frequency transposition algorithm using wearable hearing aids.
    Robinson JD; Stainsby TH; Baer T; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):384-93. PubMed ID: 19382018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 51(3):798-813. PubMed ID: 18506052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues.
    Swaminathan J; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2078-90. PubMed ID: 25235005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.
    Kong YY; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):959-80. PubMed ID: 21060139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Pittman AL; Hoover BM; Lewis DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2183-90. PubMed ID: 11681394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined effects of frequency compression-expansion and shift on speech recognition.
    Başkent D; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):277-89. PubMed ID: 17485977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.