These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19925667)

  • 1. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.
    O'Brien KR; Gabriel RS; Greiser A; Cowan BR; Young AA; Kerr AJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2009 Nov; 11(1):49. PubMed ID: 19925667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of Stroke Volume and Aortic Valve Area in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: A Comparison of Echocardiography versus Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
    Guzzetti E; Capoulade R; Tastet L; Garcia J; Le Ven F; Arsenault M; Bédard E; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Aug; 33(8):953-963.e5. PubMed ID: 32580897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment.
    Troger F; Tiller C; Reindl M; Lechner I; Holzknecht M; Pamminger M; Poskaite P; Kremser C; Ulmer H; Gizewski ER; Bauer A; Reinstadler S; Metzler B; Klug G; Mayr A
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 161():110722. PubMed ID: 36758278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Troger F; Lechner I; Reindl M; Tiller C; Holzknecht M; Pamminger M; Kremser C; Schwaiger J; Reinstadler SJ; Bauer A; Metzler B; Mayr A; Klug G
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 34986847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nickl W; Füth R; Smettan J; Köhler T; Lankisch M; Kramer F; Krahn T; Barroso MC; Klein RM; Dinh W
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 98(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 22370613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of aortic stenosis diagnostic parameters: comparison of fast 3 direction and 1 direction phase contrast CMR and transthoracic echocardiography.
    da Silveira JS; Smyke M; Rich AV; Liu Y; Jin N; Scandling D; Dickerson JA; Rochitte CE; Raman SV; Potter LC; Ahmad R; Simonetti OP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):35. PubMed ID: 28270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.
    Maes F; Pierard S; de Meester C; Boulif J; Amzulescu M; Vancraeynest D; Pouleur AC; Pasquet A; Gerber B; Vanoverschelde JL
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 28292302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
    Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simplified continuity equation approach to the quantification of stenotic bicuspid aortic valves using velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Yap SC; van Geuns RJ; Meijboom FJ; Kirschbaum SW; McGhie JS; Simoons ML; Kilner PJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 18066750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using a hybrid approach of Doppler echocardiography and inert gas rebreathing.
    Hamm K; Trinkmann F; Heggemann F; Gruettner J; Schmid-Bindert G; Borggrefe M; Haghi D; Saur J
    In Vivo; 2012; 26(6):1027-33. PubMed ID: 23160688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.
    Poh KK; Levine RA; Solis J; Shen L; Flaherty M; Kang YJ; Guerrero JL; Hung J
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Oct; 29(20):2526-35. PubMed ID: 18263866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study.
    La Manna A; Sanfilippo A; Capodanno D; Salemi A; Polizzi G; Deste W; Cincotta G; Cadoni A; Marchese A; Figuera M; Ussia GP; Pittalà R; Privitera C; Tamburino C
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Dec; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 22202669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.
    Bruder O; Jochims M; Hunold P; Jensen C; Forsting M; Sabin GV; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 19452337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for left ventricular outflow tract measurements in severe aortic stenosis. A cross-sectional study using computer tomography and Haegar sizers as reference.
    Norum IB; Edvardsen T; Ruddox V; Gunther A; Dahle G; Otterstad JE
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2020 Aug; 54(4):220-226. PubMed ID: 32408833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.