174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19925673)
1. Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.
Hendrix MJ; Evers SM; Basten MC; Nijhuis JG; Severens JL
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Nov; 9():211. PubMed ID: 19925673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.
Hitzert M; Hermus MM; Boesveld II; Franx A; van der Pal-de Bruin KK; Steegers EE; van den Akker-van Marle EM
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016960. PubMed ID: 28893750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic implications of home births and birth centers: a structured review.
Henderson J; Petrou S
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18507585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does fear of childbirth or family history affect whether pregnant Dutch women prefer a home- or hospital birth?
Sluijs AM; Cleiren MP; Scherjon SA; Wijma K
Midwifery; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26320703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
Hermus MAA; Hitzert M; Boesveld IC; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Dommelen PV; Franx A; Graaf JP; Lith JMMV; Luurssen-Masurel N; Steegers EAP; Wiegers TA; Bruin KMVP
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e016958. PubMed ID: 29150465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.
van Haaren-Ten Haken T; Hendrix M; Nieuwenhuijze M; Budé L; de Vries R; Nijhuis J
Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 22921160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial.
Bernitz S; Aas E; Øian P
Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):591-9. PubMed ID: 22901492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eliciting preferences for key attributes of intrapartum care in the Netherlands.
van Haaren-ten Haken T; Pavlova M; Hendrix M; Nieuwenhuijze M; de Vries R; Nijhuis J
Birth; 2014 Jun; 41(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 24702440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does a referral from home to hospital affect satisfaction with childbirth? A cross-national comparison.
Christiaens W; Gouwy A; Bracke P
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jul; 7():109. PubMed ID: 17626631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases.
de Jonge A; Geerts CC; van der Goes BY; Mol BW; Buitendijk SE; Nijhuis JG
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 25204886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exclusive breastfeeding after home versus hospital birth in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands.
de Cock TP; Manniën J; Geerts C; Klomp T; de Jonge A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Oct; 15():262. PubMed ID: 26463347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Home-based care after a shortened hospital stay versus hospital-based care postpartum: an economic evaluation.
Petrou S; Boulvain M; Simon J; Maricot P; Borst F; Perneger T; Irion O
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):800-6. PubMed ID: 15270927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transfer from home to hospital: what is its effect on the experience of childbirth?
Wiegers TA; van der Zee J; Keirse MJ
Birth; 1998 Mar; 25(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 9534501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.
de Jonge A; Mesman JA; Manniën J; Zwart JJ; van Dillen J; van Roosmalen J
BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3263. PubMed ID: 23766482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
Schroeder E; Petrou S; Patel N; Hollowell J; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Brocklehurst P;
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2292. PubMed ID: 22517916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pathway to establish a publicly funded home birth program in Australia.
White C; Tarrant M; Hodges R; Wallace EM; Kumar A
Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e420-e428. PubMed ID: 31668870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Costs of Planned Home vs. Hospital Birth in British Columbia Attended by Registered Midwives and Physicians.
Janssen PA; Mitton C; Aghajanian J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133524. PubMed ID: 26186720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands.
Christiaens W; Bracke P
Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):e11-9. PubMed ID: 17512100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
