377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19926350)
1. Comparison of the sensitivity of evaporative universal detectors and LC/MS in the HILIC and the reversed-phase HPLC modes.
Mitchell CR; Bao Y; Benz NJ; Zhang S
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 Dec; 877(32):4133-9. PubMed ID: 19926350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention pattern profiling of fungal metabolites on mixed-mode reversed-phase/weak anion exchange stationary phases in comparison to reversed-phase and weak anion exchange separation materials by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry.
Apfelthaler E; Bicker W; Lämmerhofer M; Sulyok M; Krska R; Lindner W; Schuhmacher R
J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1191(1-2):171-81. PubMed ID: 18199445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography versus reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry: effect of electrospray ionization source geometry on sensitivity.
Periat A; Kohler I; Bugey A; Bieri S; Versace F; Staub C; Guillarme D
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Aug; 1356():211-20. PubMed ID: 25017394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for the quantification of ephedrines using medium-resolution accurate mass spectrometry.
Gray N; Heaton J; Musenga A; Cowan DA; Plumb RS; Smith NW
J Chromatogr A; 2013 May; 1289():37-46. PubMed ID: 23570855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the response of four aerosol detectors used with ultra high pressure liquid chromatography.
Hutchinson JP; Li J; Farrell W; Groeber E; Szucs R; Dicinoski G; Haddad PR
J Chromatogr A; 2011 Mar; 1218(12):1646-55. PubMed ID: 21315361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the universal response of evaporative light scattering detection by mobile phase compensation.
de Villiers A; Górecki T; Lynen F; Szucs R; Sandra P
J Chromatogr A; 2007 Aug; 1161(1-2):183-91. PubMed ID: 17568599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses.
Chambers E; Wagrowski-Diehl DM; Lu Z; Mazzeo JR
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Jun; 852(1-2):22-34. PubMed ID: 17236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel, fully automatic hydrophilic interaction/reversed-phase column-switching high-performance liquid chromatographic system for the complementary analysis of polar and apolar compounds in complex samples.
Wang Y; Lehmann R; Lu X; Zhao X; Xu G
J Chromatogr A; 2008 Sep; 1204(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 18692192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two aerosol-based detectors for the analysis of gabapentin in pharmaceutical formulations by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Jia S; Park JH; Lee J; Kwon SW
Talanta; 2011 Oct; 85(5):2301-6. PubMed ID: 21962646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of inorganic pharmaceutical counterions using hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled with a Corona CAD detector.
Huang Z; Richards MA; Zha Y; Francis R; Lozano R; Ruan J
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2009 Dec; 50(5):809-14. PubMed ID: 19616396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the mobile phase additives on sensitivity in the analysis of peptides and proteins by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry.
García MC
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2005 Oct; 825(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 16213445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance evaluation of evaporative light scattering detection and charged aerosol detection in reversed phase liquid chromatography.
Vervoort N; Daemen D; Török G
J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1189(1-2):92-100. PubMed ID: 18054946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stationary and mobile phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a review.
Jandera P
Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Apr; 692(1-2):1-25. PubMed ID: 21501708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthogonal separation on one beta-cyclodextrin column by switching reversed-phase liquid chromatography and hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Feng JT; Guo ZM; Shi H; Gu JP; Jin Y; Liang XM
Talanta; 2010 Jun; 81(4-5):1870-6. PubMed ID: 20441989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixed-mode ion-exchangers and their comparative chromatographic characterization in reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction chromatography elution modes.
Lämmerhofer M; Richter M; Wu J; Nogueira R; Bicker W; Lindner W
J Sep Sci; 2008 Aug; 31(14):2572-88. PubMed ID: 18693304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic comparison of sensitivity between hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry.
Periat A; Boccard J; Veuthey JL; Rudaz S; Guillarme D
J Chromatogr A; 2013 Oct; 1312():49-57. PubMed ID: 24034137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 96-well single-pot liquid-liquid extraction, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of muraglitazar in human plasma.
Xue YJ; Liu J; Unger S
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2006 Jun; 41(3):979-88. PubMed ID: 16533587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Separation and characterisation of five polar herbicides using countercurrent chromatography with detection by negative ion electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry.
Kidwell H; Jones JJ; Games DE
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2001; 15(14):1181-6. PubMed ID: 11445900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous determination of melamine and related compounds by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry.
Xia J; Zhou N; Zhou C; Chen B; Wu Y; Yao S
J Sep Sci; 2010 Sep; 33(17-18):2688-97. PubMed ID: 20658490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A single step reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography separation of polar and non-polar lipids.
Olsson P; Holmbäck J; Herslöf B
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Nov; 1369():105-15. PubMed ID: 25441077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
