These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19926382)

  • 1. A new example of scientific bias of the English language: the American guide to stopping smoking treatment.
    de Granda-Orive JI; Solano-Reina S; Jiménez-Ruiz C
    Arch Bronconeumol; 2010 Feb; 46(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 19926382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.
    Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PRISMA.
    Blegen MA
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(4):233. PubMed ID: 20585220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Problems with meta-analysis.
    Herbison P
    N Z Med J; 1999 Feb; 112(1081):38-41. PubMed ID: 10078215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The specter of publication bias: adjustment for publication bias in the evidence on cardiac death associated with passive smoking in nonsmoking women.
    Takagi H; Umemoto T
    Int J Cardiol; 2011 Jun; 149(3):388-9. PubMed ID: 21453980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
    Evans D; Kowanko I
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy.
    Vanchieri C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Nov; 89(21):1568-9. PubMed ID: 9362150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis. Part 2: Assessing the quality of published meta-analyses.
    Wilson A; Henry DA
    Med J Aust; 1992 Feb; 156(3):173-4, 177-80, 184-7. PubMed ID: 1545719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.
    Baker R; Jackson D
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 16984321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Publication languages of Impact Factor journals and of medical bibliographic databanks].
    Winkmann G; Schlutius S; Schweim HG
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Jan; 127(4):131-7. PubMed ID: 11807656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The language barrier and institutional provincialism in science.
    Stolerman IP; Stenius K
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2008 Jan; 92(1-3):1-2. PubMed ID: 17826005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rethinking credible evidence synthesis.
    Doshi P; Jones M; Jefferson T
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7898. PubMed ID: 22252039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
    Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Harms M
    Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis in surgery: methods and limitations.
    Ng TT; McGory ML; Ko CY; Maggard MA
    Arch Surg; 2006 Nov; 141(11):1125-30; discussion 1131. PubMed ID: 17116806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies.
    Gleser LJ; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2493-507. PubMed ID: 8961459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical appraisal of review articles.
    Hutchison BG
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 May; 39():1097-102. PubMed ID: 8499790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.