558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19926386)
21. Quality of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during paediatric resuscitation training: time to stop the blind leading the blind.
Arshid M; Lo TY; Reynolds F
Resuscitation; 2009 May; 80(5):558-60. PubMed ID: 19328616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.
Steen S; Sjöberg T; Olsson P; Young M
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16159692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Poor chest compression quality with mechanical compressions in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, cross-over manikin study.
Blomberg H; Gedeborg R; Berglund L; Karlsten R; Johansson J
Resuscitation; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21724317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Compression force-depth relationship during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Tomlinson AE; Nysaether J; Kramer-Johansen J; Steen PA; Dorph E
Resuscitation; 2007 Mar; 72(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 17141936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing.
Edelson DP; Litzinger B; Arora V; Walsh D; Kim S; Lauderdale DS; Vanden Hoek TL; Becker LB; Abella BS
Arch Intern Med; 2008 May; 168(10):1063-9. PubMed ID: 18504334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Chest compressions by ambulance personnel on chests with variable stiffness: abilities and attitudes.
Ødegaard S; Kramer-Johansen J; Bromley A; Myklebust H; Nysaether J; Wik L; Steen PA
Resuscitation; 2007 Jul; 74(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 17368692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A randomized, controlled comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on the floor and on a moving ambulance stretcher.
Kim JA; Vogel D; Guimond G; Hostler D; Wang HE; Menegazzi JJ
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2006; 10(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 16418093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of transport on quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Ødegaard S; Olasveengen T; Steen PA; Kramer-Johansen J
Resuscitation; 2009 Aug; 80(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 19477573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals.
Pozner CN; Almozlino A; Elmer J; Poole S; McNamara D; Barash D
Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 29(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 20825844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Resuscitation, prolonged cardiac arrest, and an automated chest compression device.
Risom M; Jørgensen H; Rasmussen LS; Sørensen AM
J Emerg Med; 2010 May; 38(4):481-3. PubMed ID: 19217242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation following modification of a standard telephone-directed protocol.
Deakin CD; Cheung S; Petley GW; Clewlow F
Resuscitation; 2007 Mar; 72(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 17239515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality of chest compressions during 10min of single-rescuer basic life support with different compression: ventilation ratios in a manikin model.
Bjørshol CA; Søreide E; Torsteinbø TH; Lexow K; Nilsen OB; Sunde K
Resuscitation; 2008 Apr; 77(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18207627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A randomized trial of the capability of elderly lay persons to perform chest compression only CPR versus standard 30:2 CPR.
Neset A; Birkenes TS; Myklebust H; Mykletun RJ; Odegaard S; Kramer-Johansen J
Resuscitation; 2010 Jul; 81(7):887-92. PubMed ID: 20418006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins.
Odegaard S; Saether E; Steen PA; Wik L
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 17069958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A failed attempt to improve quality of out-of-hospital CPR through performance evaluation.
Olasveengen TM; Tomlinson AE; Wik L; Sunde K; Steen PA; Myklebust H; Kramer-Johansen J
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17907028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transport with ongoing resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical compression.
Gässler H; Ventzke MM; Lampl L; Helm M
Emerg Med J; 2013 Jul; 30(7):589-92. PubMed ID: 22833595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study.
Lakomek F; Lukas RP; Brinkrolf P; Mennewisch A; Steinsiek N; Gutendorf P; Sudowe H; Heller M; Kwiecien R; Zarbock A; Bohn A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229431. PubMed ID: 32092113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reduced hands-off-time and time to first shock in CPR according to the ERC Guidelines 2005.
Roessler B; Fleischhackl R; Losert H; Arrich J; Mittlboeck M; Domanovits H; Hoerauf K
Resuscitation; 2009 Jan; 80(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 18992984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of caregiver gender, age, and feedback prompts on chest compression rate and depth.
Peberdy MA; Silver A; Ornato JP
Resuscitation; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1169-74. PubMed ID: 19674826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
