These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19926589)

  • 1. The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.
    Dimenstein IB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Dec; 132(6):975-6; author reply 976-7. PubMed ID: 19926589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.
    Zarbo RJ; Tuthill JM; D'Angelo R; Varney R; Mahar B; Neuman C; Ormsby A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):468-77. PubMed ID: 19289582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.
    Fabbretti G
    Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 22558887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Getting It Right for Patient Safety:  Specimen Collection Process Improvement From Operating Room to Pathology.
    D'Angelo R; Mejabi O
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Jul; 146(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 27402606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality in pathology: of Deming, the Edsel, and Henry Ford.
    Renshaw AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):461-2. PubMed ID: 19289580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Informatics in Patient Safety and Quality Assurance.
    Nakhleh RE
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Jun; 8(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 26065802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.
    Layfield LJ; Anderson GM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 134(3):466-70. PubMed ID: 20716804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
    Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar-code specimen labeling process.
    Hill PM; Mareiniss D; Murphy P; Gardner H; Hsieh YH; Levy F; Kelen GD
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 20822830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk management: correct patient and specimen identification in a surgical pathology laboratory. The experience of Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
    Fabbretti G
    Pathologica; 2010 Jun; 102(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 21171512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy.
    Morrison AP; Tanasijevic MJ; Goonan EM; Lobo MM; Bates MM; Lipsitz SR; Bates DW; Melanson SE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):870-7. PubMed ID: 20472844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bar Coding and Tracking in Pathology.
    Hanna MG; Pantanowitz L
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Jun; 8(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 26065787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Henry ford production system: effective reduction of process defects and waste in surgical pathology.
    Zarbo RJ; D'Angelo R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Dec; 128(6):1015-22. PubMed ID: 18024328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Labeling pathology specimens.
    Huber DA
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 16552306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Practical Approach to Investigating Cross-Contaminants in the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory.
    Hodgson AJ; Shang YM; Boulianne P; Downes MR; Hwang D; Slodkowska E
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 Oct; 28(7):700-710. PubMed ID: 32188330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gone but not forgotten: the search for the lost surgical specimens: application of quality improvement techniques in reducing medical error.
    Slavin L; Best MA; Aron DC
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2001; 10(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 11702470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A new remedy in pathology practice: molecular solution to sample mix-up].
    Baloğlu H; Yığıt N
    Turk Patoloji Derg; 2011 May; 27(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 21630195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.