These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

801 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19927100)

  • 1. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Auerbach JD; Anakwenze OA; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
    Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation.
    Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy.
    Auerbach JD; Wills BP; McIntosh TC; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 17334286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Anakwenze OA; Auerbach JD; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2001-7. PubMed ID: 19730207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study.
    Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
    Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of total lumbar disc replacement on lumbosacral lordosis.
    Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Oct; 25(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 21738074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution of in vivo and in vitro range of motion following 1-level arthroplasty with the CHARITE artificial disc compared with fusion.
    Cunningham BW; McAfee PC; Geisler FH; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Cappuccino A; Regan JJ; Fedder IL; Tortolani PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Jan; 8(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18173340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing segmental range of motion after lumbar total disc replacement using the ProDisc II prosthesis.
    Kim DH; Ryu KS; Kim MK; Park CK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Aug; 7(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 17688051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.