These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19927337)

  • 21. The role of superoxide ions in the degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Lee KH; Chu CC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jan; 49(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate (Maxon) sutures: in vitro, in the subcutis, and in the achilles tendon of rabbits.
    Kangas J; Paasimaa S; Mäkelä P; Leppilahti J; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 11153008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of poly(glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties.
    Pavan A; Bosio M; Longo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):477-96. PubMed ID: 155699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CAPROSYN*, another major advance in synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Pineros-Fernandez A; Drake DB; Rodeheaver PA; Moody DL; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(5):359-68. PubMed ID: 15479151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study on structure-property elucidation of P3/4HB and PEG-based block polyurethanes.
    Li G; Liu Y; Li D; Zhang L; Xu K
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Sep; 100(9):2319-29. PubMed ID: 22529029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Degradation of collagen suture in vitro and in vivo.
    Okada T; Hayashi T; Ikada Y
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 1633219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Synthesis of a novel monofilament bioabsorbable suture for biomedical applications.
    de la Harpe KM; Marimuthu T; Kondiah PPD; Kumar P; Ubanako P; Choonara YE
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Oct; 110(10):2189-2210. PubMed ID: 35373911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneous dual syringe electrospinning system using benign solvent to fabricate nanofibrous P(3HB-co-4HB)/collagen peptides construct as potential leave-on wound dressing.
    Vigneswari S; Murugaiyah V; Kaur G; Abdul Khalil HPS; Amirul AA
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Sep; 66():147-155. PubMed ID: 27207048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
    Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo.
    Karaca E; Hockenberger AS
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Nov; 87(2):580-9. PubMed ID: 18506829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study.
    Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The pH dependence of monofilament sutures on hydrolytic degradation.
    Tomihata K; Suzuki M; Ikada Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 11505425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mutagenic and clastogenic characterization of poststerilized poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) copolymer biosynthesized by Delftia acidovorans.
    Siew EL; Rajab NF; Osman AB; Sudesh K; Inayat-Hussain SH
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Dec; 91(3):786-94. PubMed ID: 19051306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tissue response to the implantation of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures.
    Shishatskaya EI; Volova TG; Puzyr AP; Mogilnaya OA; Efremov SN
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):719-28. PubMed ID: 15346741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro biocompatibility and degradation of terpolyester 3HB-co-4HB-co-3HHx, consisting of 3-hydroxybutyrate, 4-hydroxybutyrate and 3-hydroxyhexanoate.
    Liu Q; Chen GQ
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2008; 19(11):1521-33. PubMed ID: 18973727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Why make monofilament sutures out of polyvinylidene fluoride?
    Urban E; King MW; Guidoin R; Laroche G; Marois Y; Martin L; Cardou A; Douville Y
    ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 8003751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone).
    Seyednejad H; Gawlitta D; Kuiper RV; de Bruin A; van Nostrum CF; Vermonden T; Dhert WJ; Hennink WE
    Biomaterials; 2012 Jun; 33(17):4309-18. PubMed ID: 22436798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.