These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1992746)

  • 1. Automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1991 Feb; 111(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 1992746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated perimetry in the management of glaucoma.
    Lalle PA; Fingeret M; Eiden SB
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Dec; 60(12):900-11. PubMed ID: 2693510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 87(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 12488273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients.
    Werner EB; Petrig B; Krupin T; Bishop KI
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 30(6):1083-9. PubMed ID: 2732022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual field examination in glaucoma.
    Mikelberg FS
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Jun; 63(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 3728644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated perimetry--Part II.
    Mills RP
    J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1984; 10(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 6501061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated perimetry, tonometry, and questionnaire in glaucoma screening.
    Mundorf TK; Zimmerman TJ; Nardin GF; Kendall KS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Nov; 108(5):505-8. PubMed ID: 2683793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating several sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects, and normals.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Berry CC; Lee AC; Girkin CA; Zangwill L; Caprioli J; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1895-902. PubMed ID: 14522760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Size threshold perimetry performs as well as conventional automated perimetry with stimulus sizes III, V, and VI for glaucomatous loss.
    Wall M; Doyle CK; Eden T; Zamba KD; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3975-83. PubMed ID: 23633660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus size for perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Swanson WH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3984. PubMed ID: 23743001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What are the options of psychophysical approaches in glaucoma?
    Monhart M
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17998037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
    Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Tanakadate A; Ishikawa S
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?
    O'Brien C; Wild JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Mar; 79(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 7703193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
    Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.