These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1992746)

  • 21. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jun; 87(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 12770962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 11384565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effective dynamic ranges of standard automated perimetry sizes III and V and motion and matrix perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Zamba G
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 128(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 20457977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients.
    Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pupillary anomaly masquerading as a glaucomatous visual field defect: a case report.
    Patton N; Tey A
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 4():6. PubMed ID: 15198808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Ahn DS; Lee PC; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1992 Mar; 113(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 1543225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Blue-yellow full threshold automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis].
    Bobeico V; Zemba M; Brătulescu M; Ciucă C; Popescu M
    Oftalmologia; 2002; 55(4):18-24. PubMed ID: 12723172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Should we use short-wavelength automated perimetry to test glaucoma patients?
    Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):792-4. PubMed ID: 11384578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry.
    Harwerth RS; Carter-Dawson L; Smith EL; Barnes G; Holt WF; Crawford ML
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3152-60. PubMed ID: 15326134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated perimetry: principles and practice.
    Beck RW
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1986; 26(4):163-73. PubMed ID: 3804627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with automated threshold perimetry.
    Sommer A; Enger C; Witt K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1987 May; 103(5):681-4. PubMed ID: 3578465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors that influence automated perimetry.
    Fingeret M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7018. PubMed ID: 23047719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.