These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19927634)

  • 21. Effect of triangle ventricular pacing on haemodynamics and dyssynchrony in patients with advanced heart failure: a comparison study with conventional bi-ventricular pacing therapy.
    Yoshida K; Seo Y; Yamasaki H; Tanoue K; Murakoshi N; Ishizu T; Sekiguchi Y; Kawano S; Otsuka S; Watanabe S; Yamaguchi I; Aonuma K
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Nov; 28(21):2610-9. PubMed ID: 17947217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contemporary issues in cardiac pacing.
    Schnorr B; Kelsch B; Cremers B; Clever YP; Speck U; Scheller B
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2010 Dec; 58(6):677-90. PubMed ID: 21135808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study.
    Gold MR; Feliciano Z; Gottlieb SS; Fisher ML
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Oct; 26(4):967-73. PubMed ID: 7560625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term follow-up of permanent transvenous pacing systems preserved during tricuspid valve replacement.
    Molina JE; Roberts CL; Benditt DG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 89(1):318-20. PubMed ID: 20103276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Practical issues in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.
    Leon AR
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2003; 4(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 12949443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rescue permanent iliac vein pacing after epicardial lead failure: an unusual reversal of pacing fortune.
    Gupta A; Halleran SM; Krishnan K; Trohman RG
    Europace; 2008 Oct; 10(10):1236-8. PubMed ID: 18606617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison between passive and active fixation leads in the coronary sinus for biatrial pacing: initial experience.
    Levy T; Walker S; Rex S; Paul V
    Europace; 2000 Jul; 2(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 11227593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy versus dual site right ventricular pacing in a patient with permanent pacemaker and congestive heart failure.
    Satish OS; Yeh KH; Wen MS; Wang CC
    Europace; 2005 Jul; 7(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 15944097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single-lead VDD pacing. A case of cross-talk.
    Simoncelli U; Coppola V; Gentilini C
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1997 Sep; 45(9):435-8. PubMed ID: 9436351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility and safety of a simplified draping method for pacing procedures.
    Gallagher MM; Santini L; Magliano G; Sgueglia M; Venditti F; Padula M; Romeo F
    Europace; 2007 Oct; 9(10):890-3. PubMed ID: 17566013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.
    Mair H; Sachweh J; Meuris B; Nollert G; Schmoeckel M; Schuetz A; Reichart B; Daebritz S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 27(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 15691676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crosstalk triggered safety standby pacing associated with an improperly seated ventricular lead.
    Sun Q; Chen K; Zhang S
    Europace; 2008 Jan; 10(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 18025063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of automatic threshold tracking function with non-low polarization leads: risk for algorithm malfunction.
    Luria D; Gurevitz O; Bar Lev D; Tkach Y; Eldar M; Glikson M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Apr; 27(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 15078397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The incidence of reoperations in pacemaker recipients.
    Fleck T; Khazen C; Wolner E; Grabenwoger M
    Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(5):E779-82. PubMed ID: 16844638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sheathless implantation of permanent coronary sinus-LV pacing leads.
    Hoffmeister P; Chaudhry GM; Orlov MV; Shukla G; Haffajee CI
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Feb; 29(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16492295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term results of high vs. normal impedance ventricular leads on actual (Real-Life) pacemaker generator longevity.
    Etsadashvili K; Hintringer F; Stühlinger M; Dichtl W; Spuller K; Antretter H; Hangler H; Pachinger O; Roithinger FX; Berger T
    Europace; 2009 Feb; 11(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 19056744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Permanent pacing in patients with congenital atrio-ventricular block--experience of 33 cases.
    Ventura M; Elvas L; Cristóvão J; Ramalheiro G; Coelho L; Maldonado MJ; da Silva M; Sá e Melo A; Providência LA
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 19(11):1143-54. PubMed ID: 11201630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A simplified technique for implantation of left ventricular epicardial leads for biventricular re-synchronization using video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS).
    Gabor S; Prenner G; Wasler A; Schweiger M; Tscheliessnigg KH; Smolle-Jüttner FM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 28(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 16275002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An epicardial pacing safety net: an alternative technique for pacing in the young.
    Ceresnak SR; Liberman L; Chen JM; Hordof AJ; Lamberti JJ; Bonney WJ; Pass RH
    Cardiol Young; 2009 Jun; 19(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 19272204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Re: Systematic placement of left-sided pacing leads as an appealing option for cardiac resynchronization as treatment of congestive cardiac failure in children dependent on chronic cardiac pacing.
    da Cruz E; Aggoun Y; Tissot C; Beghetti M
    Cardiol Young; 2007 Apr; 17(2):234-5. PubMed ID: 17291395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.