These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19927673)

  • 1. Input and output compensation for the cochlear traveling wave delay in wide-band ABR recordings: implications for small acoustic tumor detection.
    Don M; Elberling C; Maloff E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 19927673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brainstem responses to level-specific chirps in normal-hearing adults.
    Kristensen SG; Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):712-21. PubMed ID: 23072963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.
    Elberling C; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3022-37. PubMed ID: 19045789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory brain stem responses evoked by different chirps based on different delay models.
    Cebulla M; Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):452-60. PubMed ID: 20807481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brain stem response amplitude.
    Don M; Masuda A; Nelson R; Brackmann D
    Am J Otol; 1997 Sep; 18(5):608-21; discussion 682-5. PubMed ID: 9303158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
    de Boer J; Hardy A; Krumbholz K
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 35984541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay.
    Elberling C; Don M; Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2772-85. PubMed ID: 18189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating auditory brainstem response to a level-dependent chirp designed based on derived-band latencies.
    Huang H; Chen YF; Hsu CY; Cheng YF; Yang TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Apr; 151(4):2688. PubMed ID: 35461519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory brainstem responses to broad-band chirps: amplitude growth functions in sedated and anaesthetised infants.
    Mühler R; Rahne T; Verhey JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 23062881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral and synchrony differences in auditory brainstem responses evoked by chirps of varying durations.
    Petoe MA; Bradley AP; Wilson WJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1896-907. PubMed ID: 20968361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.
    Elberling C; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2955-64. PubMed ID: 21110591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On chirp stimuli and neural synchrony in the suprathreshold auditory brainstem response.
    Petoe MA; Bradley AP; Wilson WJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):235-46. PubMed ID: 20649219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rising-frequency chirp stimulus to effectively enhance wave-I amplitude of auditory brainstem response.
    Morimoto T; Fujisaka YI; Okamoto Y; Irino T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():104-108. PubMed ID: 30927685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching for the optimal stimulus eliciting auditory brainstem responses in humans.
    Fobel O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2213-22. PubMed ID: 15532653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Stimulus Repetition Rates on the Auditory Brainstem Response to Level-Specific CE-Chirp in Normal-Hearing Adults.
    Dzulkarnain AAA; Shahrudin FA; Jamal FN; Marzuki MN; Mazlan MNS
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):838-850. PubMed ID: 32966099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli II: Versus Adult Auditory Brainstem Responses.
    Cobb KM; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):724-743. PubMed ID: 27556524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of auditory brainstem response as a screening test for small acoustic neuromas.
    Gordon ML; Cohen NL
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 8572110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of CE Chirp.
    Biagio-de Jager L; van Dyk Z; Vinck BH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110071. PubMed ID: 32497908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.