These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19927691)

  • 1. Evidence for a cortically mediated release from inhibition in the human cochlea.
    Harkrider AW; Bowers CD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 19927691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of subject task on contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    de Boer J; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):117-23. PubMed ID: 17910996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
    Bulut E; Öztürk G; Taş M; Türkmen MT; Gülmez ZD; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2019 Jun; 106(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 31262207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The medial olivocochlear reflex strength is modulated during a visual working memory task.
    Marcenaro B; Leiva A; Dragicevic C; López V; Delano PH
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jun; 125(6):2309-2321. PubMed ID: 33978484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.
    Bidelman GM; Schneider AD; Heitzmann VR; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():275-283. PubMed ID: 27964936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased medial olivocochlear reflex strength in normal-hearing, noise-exposed humans.
    Bhatt I
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184036. PubMed ID: 28886123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suppression of otoacoustic emission is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):78-82. PubMed ID: 9259237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
    Stuart A; Butler AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Changes in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions contralateral suppression in infants].
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16625871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
    Gkoritsa E; Tsakanikos M; Korres S; Dellagrammaticas H; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.
    Backus BC; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 8(4):484-96. PubMed ID: 17932717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
    Yashaswini L; Maruthy S
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human medial efferent activity elicited by dynamic versus static contralateral noises.
    Mertes IB
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():100-109. PubMed ID: 29793763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Function and plasticity of the medial olivocochlear system in musicians: a review.
    Perrot X; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():27-40. PubMed ID: 23994434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.