These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19927928)

  • 1. [Analysis of myocardial infarction mortality: open comparisons give better picture than Riks-HIA].
    Björck S; Torgerson JS
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2622-3. PubMed ID: 19927928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current patient records systems not sufficient as a basis for ranking lists].
    Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2623. PubMed ID: 19927929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ["Open comparisons" no reliable measures of the quality of care in myocardial infarction. The epidemiological registry is not sufficient for county comparisons].
    Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 26-Sep 1; 106(35):2121-4. PubMed ID: 19827376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditing patient registration in the Swedish quality register for acute coronary syndrome.
    Rosvall M; Ohlsson H; Hansen O; Chaix B; Merlo J
    Scand J Public Health; 2010 Jul; 38(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 20406796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Health data registries necessary for follow-up of the quality of health care!].
    Köster M; Ljung R; Aberg A; Heurgren M
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Sep 16-22; 106(38):2380. PubMed ID: 19848346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The registration bog--a consequence of old-fashioned medical record-keeping].
    Morfeldt L
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 4-12; 106(45):2949-50. PubMed ID: 19998814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison Riks-HIA--medical records gave no basis for care improvement. Difficult to explain the lower number of reperfusion in ST elevation infarction in the Norrland's counties].
    Lindmark K; Jansson JH
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Jan 25-31; 109(4):158-60. PubMed ID: 22482224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The National Board of Health and Welfare about the registry debate: "The registries open for unique possibilities"].
    Heurgren M; Stegmayr B
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 11-17; 106(46):3091. PubMed ID: 19998614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mortality an uncertain indicator in quality comparisons].
    Björck S; Förars M
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Aug 27-Sep 2; 105(35):2349. PubMed ID: 18831445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Care of myocardial infarction strongly improved 1995-2005. Quality registry, open statements and clear therapeutic goals have payed off].
    Stenestrand U; Lindahl B; Wallentin L
    Lakartidningen; 2007 May 14-29; 104(20-21):1580-3. PubMed ID: 17564264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evidence-base the quality registries!].
    Järhult B; Bejerot S
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Jul 22-Aug 4; 106(30-31):1912-3. PubMed ID: 19739447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Heart infarction registry or the art of medicine--can they be united?].
    Lindström K; Järhult B
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2258-9; discussion 2259-62. PubMed ID: 17822206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [What is myocardial infarct? Quality assurance based on mortality figures is misleading if the diagnostic criteria are varying].
    Nilsson G; Agert G
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Jan; 91(1-2):28-9. PubMed ID: 8289549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Validate more! Common interest in quality assurance of Swedish health data registries].
    Ljung R; Ludvigsson JF; Mattsson F; Lagergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Oct 17-23; 109(42):1872-3. PubMed ID: 23193932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Prepare the evaluation of the quality registries].
    Ranstam J
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Oct 17-23; 109(42):1900. PubMed ID: 23193940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Guidelines, infarction care and quality].
    Möller BH
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Jun; 101(25):2205-6. PubMed ID: 15281310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [National database for research and quality development--a general medicine alternative to disease-specific quality registries].
    André M; Jaktlund E
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Mar 31-Apr 13; 107(13-14):922-3. PubMed ID: 20432869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Are mortality figures from the National Board of Health and Welfare acceptable as a quality indicator in myocardial infarction?].
    Nilsson G; Agert G
    Lakartidningen; 1997 May; 94(22):2116-8. PubMed ID: 9213671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Riks-Stroke with data on stroke shows the benefit of quality registries. Regional initiatives can make it even better].
    Wahlgren NG
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Jun; 96(22):2696. PubMed ID: 10388291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The National Board of Heath and Welfare and myocardial infarction mortality].
    Knutsson P
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(49):4525-6. PubMed ID: 8999233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.