326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19928069)
1. Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
Qian X; Rajaram R; Calderon-Colon X; Yang G; Phan T; Lalush DS; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 19928069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and feasibility studies of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Yang G; Qian X; Phan T; Sprenger F; Sultana S; Calderon-Colon X; Kearse B; Spronk D; Lu J; Zhou O
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2011 Aug; 648(Suppl 1):S220-S223. PubMed ID: 21808428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Lee YZ; Heath MD; Wang X; Foos DH; Lu J; Zhou O
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 25478786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TU-E-217BCD-11: Evaluating the Performance of a Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.
Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Qian X; Sprenger F; Spronk D; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Ruth C; Jing Z; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3916. PubMed ID: 28518705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Tucker AW; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031917. PubMed ID: 23464332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of carbon nanotube x-ray source array for stationary head computed tomography.
Spronk D; Luo Y; Inscoe CR; Lee YZ; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1089-1099. PubMed ID: 33382470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carbon nanotube electron field emitters for x-ray imaging of human breast cancer.
Gidcumb E; Gao B; Shan J; Inscoe C; Lu J; Zhou O
Nanotechnology; 2014 Jun; 25(24):245704. PubMed ID: 24869902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Second generation stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system with faster scan time and wider angular span.
Calliste J; Wu G; Laganis PE; Spronk D; Jafari H; Olson K; Gao B; Lee YZ; Zhou O; Lu J
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4482-4495. PubMed ID: 28569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization and preliminary imaging evaluation of a clinical prototype stationary intraoral tomosynthesis system.
Inscoe CR; Platin E; Mauriello SM; Broome A; Mol A; Gaalaas LR; Regan Anderson MW; Puett C; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5172-5185. PubMed ID: 30259988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-ray source motion blur modeling and deblurring with generative diffusion for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38640913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Physical aspects of different tomosynthesis systems].
Semturs F; Sturm E; Gruber R; Helbich TH
Radiologe; 2010 Nov; 50(11):982-90. PubMed ID: 20945146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhou J; Hu YH; Mertelmeier T; Ludwig J; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
